CATILINE'S CONSPIRACY. A FONDNESS for judging one work by con parison with others, perhaps altogether of a different class, argues a vulgar taste. Yet it is chiefly on this principle that the Catiline has been rated so low. Take it and Sejanus, as compositions of a particular kind, namely, as a mode of relating great historical events in the liveliest and most interesting manner, and I cannot help wishing that we had whole volumes of such plays. We might as rationally expect the excitement of the Vicar of Wakefield from Goldsmith's History of England, as that of Lear, Othello, &c. from the Sejanus or Catiline. Act i. sc. 4. Cut. Sirrah, what ail you? Pag. Nothing. (He spies one of his boys not answer.) Best. Somewhat modest. Cut. Slave, I will strike your soul out with my foot, &c. This is either an unintelligible, or, in every sense, a most unnatural, passage,-improbable, if not impossible, at the moment of signing and swearing such a conspiracy, to the most libidinous satyr. The very presence of the boys is an outrage to probability. I suspect that these lines down to the words throat opens,' should be removed back so as to follow the words ' on this part of the 6 house,' in the speech of Catiline soon after the entry of the conspirators. A total erasure, how ever, would be the best, or, rather, the only possi ble, amendment. Act ii. sc. 2. Sempronia's speech: -He is but a new fellow, An inmate here in Rome, as Catiline calls him A lodger' would have been a happier imitation of the inquilinus of Sallust. Act iv. sc. 6. Speech of Cethegus: : Can these or such be any aids to us, &c. What a strange notion Ben must have formed of a determined, remorseless, all-daring, fool-hardiness, to have represented it in such a mouthing Tamburlane, and bombastic tonguebully as this Cethegus of his ! BARTHOLOMEW FAIR. INDUCTION. Scrivener's speech: If there be never a servant-monster i' the Fair, who can help it, he says, nor a nest of antiques? HE best excuse that can be made for Jonson, THEA and in a somewhat less degree for Beaumont and Fletcher, in respect of these base and silly sneers at Shakspeare, is, that his plays were present to men's minds chiefly as acted. They had not a neat edition of them, as we have, so as, by compar ing the one with the other, to form a just notion of the mighty mind that produced the whole. At all events, and in every point of view, Jonson stands far higher in a moral light than Beaumont and Fletcher. He was a fair contemporary, and in his way, and as far as Shakspeare is concerned, an original. But Beaumont and Fletcher were always imitators of, and often borrowers from, him, and yet sneer at him with a spite far more malignant than Jonson, who, besides, has made noble compensation by his praises. Act ii. sc. 3. Just. I mean a child of the horn-thumb, a babe of booty, boy, a cut purse. Does not this confirm, what the passage itself cannot but suggest, the propriety of substituting 'booty' for beauty' in Falstaff's speech, Henry IV. Pt. I. act. i. sc. 2. Let not us, &c. ?' It is not often that old Ben condescends to imitate a modern author; but Master Dan. Knockhum Jordan and his vapours are manifest reflexes of Nym and Pistol. Ib. sc. 5. Quarl. She'll make excellent geer for the coachmakers here in Smithfield, to anoint wheels and axletrees with. Good! but yet it falls short of the speech of a Mr. Johnes, M. P., in the Common Council, on the invasion intended by Buonaparte: Houses plundered-then burnt; -sons conscribed-wives and daughters ravished, &c. &c.-" But as for you, you luxurious Aldermen! with your fat will he grease the wheels of his triumphant chariot!" Ib. sc. 6. Cok. Avoid i' your satin doublet, Numps. This reminds me of Shakspeare's' Aroint thee, witch I find in several books of that age the words aloigne and eloigne-that is, distance!' or off with you!' Perhaps 6 6 keep your aroint' was a corruption of aloigne' by the vulgar. The common etymology from ronger to gnaw seems unsatisfactory. Act iii. sc. 4. Quarl. How now, Numps! almost tired i' your protectorship? overparted, overparted? An odd sort of propheticality in this Numps and old Noll! Ib. sc. 6. Knockhum's speech : He eats with his eyes, as well as his teeth. A good motto for the Parson in Hogarth's Election Dinner, who shows how easily he might be reconciled to the Church of Rome, for he worships what he eats. Act v. sc. 5. Pup. Di. It is not prophane. Lan. It is not prophane, he says. Boy. It is prophane. Pup. It is not prophane. Boy. It is prophane. Pup. It is not prophane. Lan. Well said, coufute him with Not, still. An imitation of the quarrel between Bacchus and the Frogs in Aristophanes : Χορός. ἀλλὰ μὴν κεκραξόμεσθά γ', βρεκεκεκεξ, κοάξ, κοάξ. Διόνυσος. τούτῳ γὰρ οὐ νικήσετε. Χορός. οὐδὲ μὴν ἡμᾶς σὺ πάντως. Διόνυσος. οὐδὲ μὴν ὑμεῖς γε δή μ' οὐδέποτε. THE DEVIL IS AN ASS. Act. i. sc. 1. Pug. Why any: Fraud, Or Covetousness, or lady Vanity, The words in italics should probably be given to the master-devil, Satan. Whalley's note. THA HAT is, against all probability, and with a (for Jonson) impossible violation of characThe words plainly belong to Pug, and mark at once his simpleness and his impatience. Ib. sc. 4. Fitz-dottrel's soliloquy : ter. Compare this exquisite piece of sense, satire, and |