Obrázky na stránke
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]

And wakes the morning, from whose silver breast
*The sun ariseth in his majesty,
Who doth the world so gloriously bebold,
The cedar-tops and hills seem burnish'd gold.

Or again, it acts by so carrying on the eye of tae reader as to make him almost lose the consci. ousness of words,—to make him see every thing flashed, as Wordsworth has grandly and appropriately said,

Flashed upon that inward eye

Which is the bliss of solitude; -
and this without exciting any painful or laborious
attention, without any anatomy of description, (a
fault not uncommon in descriptive poetry)- but
with the sweetness and easy movement of nature.

is an absolute essential of poetry, and
of itself would constitute a poet, though not one of
the highest class ;- it is, however, a most hopeful
symptom, and the Venus and Adonis is one con-
tinued specimen of it.

In this beautiful poem there is an endless acti-
vity of thought in all the possible associations of
thought with thought, thought with feeling, or with
words, of feelings with feelings, and of words with

Even as the sun, with purple-colour'd face,
Had ta'en his last leare of the weeping morn,
Rose-cheek'd Adonis hied him to the chase :
Hunting he loved, but love he laughed to scorn.
Sick-thoughted Venus makes amain unto him,
And like a bold-faced suitor 'gins to woo him.

Remark the humanizing imagery and circumstances of the first two lines, and the activity of thought in the play of words in the fourth line. The whole stanza presents at once the time, the appearance of the morning, and the two persons distinctly characterized, and in six simple verses puts the reader in possession of the whole argument of the poem.

Over one arm the lusty courser's rein,
Under the other was the tender boy,
Who blush'd and pouted in a dull disdaia,
With leaden appeiite, unapt to toy,
She red and hot, as coals of glowing fire,
He red for shame, but frosty to desire :-


This stanza and the two following afford good instances of that poetic power, which I mentioned above, of making every thing present to the imagination — both the forms, and the passions which modify those forms, either actually, as in the representations of love, or anger, or other human affections; or imaginatively, by the different manner in which inanimate objects, or objects unimpassioned themselves, are caused to be seen by the mind in moments of strong excitement, and according to the kind of the excitement, — whether of jealousy, þr rage, or love, in the only appropriate sense of the word, or of the lower impulses of our nature, or finally of the poetic feeling itself. It is, perhaps, chiefly in the power of producing and reproducing the latter that the poet stands distinct.

[ocr errors]

The subject of the Venus and Adonis is unpleasing ; but the


itself is for that very reason the more illustrative of Shakspeare. There are men who can write passages of deepest pathos and even sublimity on circumstances personal to them. selves and stimulative of their own passions; but they are not, therefore, on this account poets. Read that magnificent burst of woman's patriotism and exultation, Deborah's song of victory; it is glorious, but nature is the poet there. It is quite another matter to become all things and yet remain the same,-to make the changeful god be felt in the river, the lion and the flame;—this it is, that is the true imagination. Shakspeare writes in this poem, as if he were of another planet, charming you to gaze on the movements of Venus and Adonis, as you would on the twinkling dances of two vernal butterflies.

Finally, in this poem and the Rape of Lucrece, Shakspeare gave ample proof of his possession of a most profound, energetic, and philosophical mind, without which he might have pleased, but could not have been a great dramatic poet. Chance and the necessity of his genius combined to lead him to the drama his proper province: in his conquest of which we should consider both the difficulties which opposed him, and the advantages by which he was assisted.

[ocr errors]

Shakspeare's Judgment equal to his Genius.

Thus then Shakspeare appears, from his Venus and Adonis and Rape of Lucrece alone, apart from all his great works, to have possessed all the conditions of the true poet. Let me now proceed to destroy, as far as may be in my power, the popular notion that he was a great dramatist by mere instinct, that he grew immortal in his own despite, and sank below men of second or third-rate power, when he attempted aught beside the drama-even as bees construct their cells and manufacture their honey to admirable perfection ; but would in vain attempt to build a nest. Now this mode of reconciling a compelled sense of inferiority with a feeling of pride, began in a few pedants, who having read that Sophocles was the great model of tragedy, and Aristotle the infallible dictator of its rules, and finding that the Lear, Hamlet, Othello and other master-pieces were neither in imitation of Sophocles, nor in obedience to Aristotle,—and not having (with one or two exceptions) the courage to affirm, that the delight which their country received from generation to generation, in defiance of the alterations of circumstances and habits, was wholly groundless,-took upon them, as a happy medium and refuge, to talk of Shakspeare as a sort of beautiful lusus naturæ, a delightful monster,—wild, indeed,

[ocr errors]

and without taste or judgment, but like the inspired idiots so much venerated in the East, uttering, amid the strangest follies, the sublimest truths. Io nine places out of ten in which I find his awful name mentioned, it is with some epithet of wild,' 'irregular,' pure child of nature,' &c. If all this be true, we must submit to it; though to a thinking mind it cannot but be painful to find any excellence, merely human, thrown out of all human analogy, and thereby leaving us neither rules for imitation, nor motives to imitate ;-but if false, it is a dan. gerous falsehood ;-for it affords a refuge to secret self-conceit,-enables a vain man at once to escape his reader's indignation by general swoln panegyrics, and merely by his ipse dixit to treat, as contemptible, what he has not intellect enough to comprehend, or soul to feel, without assigning any reason, or referring his opinion to any demonstrative principle ;-thus leaving Shakspeare as a sort of grand Lama, adored indeed, and his very excrements prized as relics, but with no authority or real influence. I grieve that every late voluminous edition of his works would enable me to substan. tiate the present charge with a variety of facts one tenth of which would of themselves exhaust the time allotted to me. Every critic, who has or has not made a collection of black letter books-in itself a useful and respectable amusement,-puts on the seven-league boots of self-opinion, and strides at once from an illustrator into a supreme

[ocr errors]
« PredošláPokračovať »