Fitzurse. No, not a word. "Tis likely that the King Archbishop Becket. Oh, what a thing is truth! we're apt to think Fitzurse. A homily, my Lord. We are not here to undergo Hugh de Tracy (addressing the Archbishop's Attendants.) If he But you, Archbishop Becket. Escapes! who dares to talk of such a word? [Exeunt Knights and Attendunts. John of Salisbury. Oh, my good lord, why did you thus rebuke them, Whetting their rage against you? Had you now Consulted us before you spoke— Archbishop Becket. There is No need of counsel: what I ought to do My Lord, they arm! Archbishop Becket. Archbishop Becket. [Exeunt omnes. We cannot dismiss this volume without quoting a most touching passage, in which Henry addresses his son; it is full of poetry and pathos : King Henry. Henry, what had I done to thee, unless I made thy greatness grow too soon, and thus Prepared thy fall? Oh, child, when I am gone, Shall surely show thee all that may have happened What words of fire will this unholy war Make known itself in? Oh I could weep for thee, We now take our leave of the author, wishing him-not inaptly, we hope-a "fair stage"-he will need " no favour." Modern Painters; their Superiority in the Art of Landscape Painting to all the Ancient Masters, proved by Examples of the True, the Beautiful, and the Intellectual, from the Works of Modern Artists, especially from those of J. M. W. Turner, Esq., R.A. By a GRADUATE OF OXFORD. - The object of this work is amply set forth in this somewhat lengthy title. The writer, it is very evident, is an enthusiastic admirer-nay, worshipper is not too strong a term of the artist whose name stands so conspicuously in the title-page; and, like a true idolator, he can see no faults in his divinity-Turner. Perhaps there never was a painter, in respect of whose works such extreme opinions were entertained; some inveighing against them as the wild extravagances of a madman, and others holding them up as the perfection of art. Now, it is said that the truth lies between the two extremes; but, in our opinion, the truth in this instance is far more on the side of his admirers than his revilers-for reviled he is. While we assert this, we are ready to admit that there are some of Turner's paintings, the prologue and epilogue to the Deluge, for instance, which are utterly beyond the reach of our comprehension. We have always held that the taste necessary to the appreciation of works of art is a kind of second sight, and it is not the gift of every man; but we can account for the admiration which many express of these two pictures, on no other theory than that of the existence of a third sight, a faculty denied to ourselves, in common with the great majority of those who lay pretensions to taste. And yet we have seen many of Turner's works which, though they have puzzled our philosophy as drawings, have produced magnificent engravings; hence we argue, that if the translations be so beautiful there must be, at least, equal beauty in the originals, if we were only learned enough to find it out. If, therefore, there be any truth in this test, we should pause before we attribute the blame to the artist which may belong to ourselves. The author of the work before us, however, transcends in the measure of his praise all the admirers of Turner whom we have ever met with or heard of. "He is above all criticism," says our Graduate, "beyond all animadversion, and beyond all praise. His works are not to be received as in any way subjects or matters of opinion, but of faith. We are not to approach them to be pleased, but to be taught; not to form a judgment, but to receive a lesson." Now, it would be absurd to attempt to reason with one who takes up a subject under the influence of an enthusiasm such as is here displayed. It shuts out all argument. While, however, we feel called upon to enter our caveat against this sweeping assumption of Turner's infallibility-assuredly a divine, August 1843.-VOL. XXXVII.-NO. CXLVIII. and not a human attribute-we cannot refrain from pronouncing this to be a most extraordinary book. It is the work of a poet as well as a painter and could have been written by no man who is not, in the full sense and meaning of the words, both the one and the other. We never, until we had the pleasure-and an exquisite one it has been to us of reading this work, were so thoroughly convinced of the twin sisterhood of the two arts. It is the most eloquent, because it is the most poetical, volume of prose we ever read; in fact, it cannot be called prose: it is the pure gold before it has been fashioned by the artificer; it is poetry without the fillagree work of rhyme and metre. It is impossible for us, in our allotted space, to go fully into the merits of a volume of more than four hundred pages, on such a subject; the utmost we can attempt is, by an example of the startling éloquence of the work, to justify the eulogium we have ventured to pronounce upon it. The author, in justification of his preference of modern over ancient landscape painting, says: "And if, in the application of these principles, in spite of my endeavour to render it impartial, the feeling and fondness which I have for some works of modern art escape me sometimes where it should not, let it be pardoned as little more than a fair counterbalance to that peeuliar veneration with which the work of the older master, associated as it has ever been in our ears with the expression of whatever is great or perfect, must be usually regarded by the reader. I do not say that this veneration is wrong, nor that we should be less attentive to the repeated words of time: but let us not forget, that if honour be for the dead, gratitude can only be for the living. He who has once stood beside the grave, to look back upon the companionship which has been for ever closed, feeling how impotent there are the wild love, or the keen sorrow, to give one instant's pleasure to the pulseless heart, or atone in the lowest measure to the departed spirit for the hour of unkindness, will scarcely for the future incur that debt to the heart, which can only be discharged to the dust. But the lesson which men receive as individuals, they do not learn as nations. Again and again they have seen their noblest descend into the grave, and have thought it enough to garland the tombstone when they had not crowned the brow, and to pay the honour to the ashes, which they had denied to the spirit. Let it not displease them that they are bidden, amidst the tumult and the dazzle of their busy life, to listen for the few voices, and watch for the few lamps, which God has toned and lighted to charm and to guide them, that they may not learn their sweetness by their silence, nor their light by their decay." Our readers will perceive that we have dealt with this volume as a work of literature and not of art; in fact, it could only be dealt with in the latter point of view by an artist, and one of no mean grade. We have not allowed our admiration of the author's powers of the pen to betray us into any recognition of his opinions on the subject of painting; our sole object being to invite attention to a volume of what we hold to be true poetry in the garb of prose. Felix Summerly's Hand Book for the City of Canterbury; its Historical Associations and Works of Art; with Illustrations, and a Map of the City. In these days of Hand Books and Guides, it is impossible, go to what quarter of the world you will, to miss your way, and it will be your own fault if you do not see all that is to be seen. Mr. Felix Summerly, of happy name, is a most agreeable travelling companion, and his ubiquitous faculty is quite wonderful; we meet him at Hampton Court, Westminster Abbey, the Temple Church, and the National Galleries, and find him a most useful and intelligent cicerone. Our author appears disposed to take the good citizens of Canterbury to task for their non-appreciation of the treasures by which they are surrounded, and opens his work by an earnest appeal to the authorities" for the protection and preservation of the still existing noble antiquities of Canterbury." He suggests, and with great point and propriety, the formation of a "Canterbury Camden Society," whose object should be the protection of the remaining specimens of ancient art in the city. The Illustrations are numerous, and exceedingly well executed. Poems. By HENRY H. METHUEN, Esq., B.A. Ushered in by a somewhat awkward preface, we have here a volume of poems, which, in these prosaic and utilitarian days, springs up before us like a fountain in the desert. There is much graceful thought and poetical vigour in many of the specimens here given of the author's powers; but they bear not the stamp of equal merit, and one can scarcely imagine some of the feebler pieces to have been from the pen which could produce the following. "Some glimpses of a paradise will shine, Like the first streak of morning on the heart; All nature has its melody; the breeze With their wild music each our bosoms fill; So terrible that few its grandeur seek : Which quenches not its fire but checks its force.) Scours o'er the waving crop, and leaves a wreck; As stars at night lie mirrored on the tide, What fairy scenes have shone, and passed away; With all the charms recalled which once they wore, Upon the mind their happy thoughts will pour: Till sleep steals softly o'er us, as a cloud Floats o'er the moon, and each fair scene retreats, As ships grow faint on ocean's circling shroud, There is also much spirit, beauty, and harmony of versification in the poem entitled "Babylon," which we cannot refrain from quoting. |