Obrázky na stránke
PDF
ePub
[graphic][subsumed]

This department is for the use of our readers, and contributions are solicited on subjects relating to any social, religious or political question. All manuscript sent in must bear the author's name, though a nom de plume will be printed if so desired. The publishers will not, of course, be understood as necessarily endorsing any of the views expressed.

What of Anarchism in the Future?

The thoughts which have been awakened in the minds of educated, patriotic, thoughtful American citizens, by the recent assassination of President McKinley, are doubtless more numerous and varied, if possible, than have been voiced by the multitudinous expressions which have been evoked. The terrible act of the murderer in its effects penetrated so deeply the hearts and minds of men, that time will be required to determine what are to be the final utterances which will shape themselves in abiding form and settled purpose. At such a time the first out-givings are quite apt to be noisy, inflammatory, and, in a measure at least, valueless. Who that has read soberly what has been suggested by newspapers and public men in regard to the "takingoff" of the President, and the proper course to be pursued toward anarchism and anarchists, has not realized that much of it was far from being weighty? Czolgosz was an anarchist and assassin. We have never heard that he could be pictured as Shakespeare pictures an assassin:

"This is the man should do the bloody deed; He showed his warrant to a friend of mine; The image of a heinous fault

Lives in his eye; that close aspect of his Does show the mood of a much troubled breast."

He had heard Emma Goldman. Dreamy, visionary, thriftless. idle, his brain became fired. He corresponded with Emma Goldman. Emma Goldman's inflammatory, anarchistic ideas. came to be the abiding subject of his thought, the constant topic of his conversation as he went from neighborhood to neighborhood, mingling with those

who, like himself, reveled in filth. Czolgosz was a little anarchist who assassinated a great and good ruler and a noble, beloved man. He says he thought he was doing his duty. What conception a really brainy anarchistic leader can have of duty is an ethical and moral question beyond the writer's fathoming. Without law, what becomes of duty? Where does it find a place? A little, ignorant person like Czolgosz, might be an anarchist and might have very little, erroneous ideas about duty. Undoubtedly this man became, in his way, absolutely fiendish and bloodthirsty toward men in authority in all lands. The thought that so insignificant a social mote might be fanned out to do a deed so terrible, so far-reaching in its consequences, is appalling in the extreme. The social mote is wiped off the face of the earth, but the wind which blew it where it did infinite harm, leaving an ineffaceable blot upon the pages of history, is still doing its damnable, deadly work. Czolgosz had a speedy and a fair trial. Justice was done; it was not delayed by technicalities. But anarchism remains. The deed of the assassin revealed a social condition. The deadly poison had scattered its disease germs through the nation's social and political atmosphere. The deed of Czolgosz so clarified the atmosphere that thousands upon thousands whose eyes were held, and who were drifting into the current, suddenly saw, as nothing else of which we can conceive could have made them see, that we are living in the midst of danger.

Is anarchism to be gotten rid of easily and speedily? The tongue is a little riember, and boasteth great things. The tongue is a fire, a world of inquity: it is

[ocr errors]

set on fire of hell. The tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. We talk of banishing anarchists, we talk of branding and ostracising them. We talk of legislating in various ways against them, of cutting them off as immigrants, of making anarchistic utterances by explicit definition, treason. If any or all these things were done, should we be freed from anarchism? It is from the ranks of the idle, the thriftless, that anarchists come. The poor ye always have with you, and as long as human nature remains unchanged, there will be idle, shiftless, discontented poor, from among whom the ranks of anarchism will be fed. There must needs be many and various laws, which shall bring that reorganization of society which will substitute thrift for thriftlessness, cleanly homes for tramps, noble, patriotic aspirations and universal unselfishness for pessimistic hatred, envy, absence of faith, and so on, down the catalogue, to anarchism. There must be laws, and, what is more important, a public sentiment which will see to it that law is enforced. But the work which is to eliminate the anarchistic spirit, and make the world law-abiding, which is to give perfect safety under necessary governmental restraint, is one which reaches far into the future. There can be no doubt that love of our country, love of liberty, regulated by law, a higher view of the duties and privileges of the citizen of

free republic, are to be the outcome of the sad event which has bereft the United States of a noble ruler. There are to be more who are truly patriotic, and fewer who let partisan views control their actions. It is to be hoped that journalism, which, under the guise of championing the cause of the poor against the rich, ministers to envy and selfishness, will be curtailed. Let us hope that the words of our great American poet may not be verified in the critical period through which we are passing.

"For humanity sweeps onward, where today the martyr stands,

On the morrow crouches Judas with the silver in his hands;

While the hooting mob of yesterday in silent awe return,

To glean up the scattered ashes into history's golden urn."

-Geo. M. Gage

McKinley's Character

A great fe has gone out, struck by the hand of the assassin. The chief magistrate of a great nation, in the prime of a noble manhood, and in the act of a loving, pleasing service, meets death, an i fame writes his name amongst her heroes and history with the martyrs. A tribute to such a life is one of unalloyed pleasure, but mingled with the task is the knowledge that whatever sentiments are awakened in the American people by their sorrow for the loss of such a man, the striking fact is apparent that up to the last moment Mr. McKinley was never thoroughly understood by the average citizen. The outburst of sorrow for his untimely fate has been spontaneous, yet it is more of a public regret for the act than sorrow for a personal loss. This must be attributed to the fact that although Mr. McKinley has been successful, he has never really been in popular touch with the people. True, his career as a politician, soldier, statesman and representative of the people has been in a large degree remarkably free from error; yet he has never been an ideal, and never has been great in the sense that Lincoln, Garfield or Washington

were.

To the casual observer he has ever remained a reticent enigma, and his conservative and perhaps class tendencies have helped to mystify a trifle the average citizen. This has helped to keep his true character hidden. For a man who has made the chief position in the Nation's gift his objective point, and who successfully reached it, it is perhaps strange to say that his personal character, his home traits and his love and devotion to his wife, were amongst his strongest characteristics, and were the chief facts that contributed to his popularity amongst his intimates. His last moments were those of sublime heroism. His utmost self-abnegation, the love of his wife that manifested itself, the sublime knowledge that he had done his duty faithfully and honorably, and the great resignation with which he quietly submitted to the inevitable and prepared to meet his Maker, have brought the American people to a realization of the great loss they have sustained.

-B. Keene

[graphic][subsumed][merged small]

It's a mistake to suppose that the ideal husband is the handiwork of the ideal wife. He isn't. He's a species distinct, rare, coveted, and not dependent for fundamental principle upon the woman he marries, says Lavinia Hart in the October "Cosmopolitan."

In witness whereof is the established hopelessness of marrying a man to reform him; and likewise the not inirequent instance of a thoroughly noble and unselfish husband with a most unworthy wife.

The ideal husband is the direct result, first, of his mother's training; second, of his early environment and the character and habits that environment has created; and third, of the progressive decade in which he has developed, a decade of higher standards, greater requirement and magnificent fulfilment.

The ideal husband is essentially a twentieth-century innovation. The virtues which make him ideal were not virtues in the past. His liberality would have shocked his ancestors; his attitude of equality toward the sex of his mother would have wounded their vanity, and his wholesome unselfishness, resulting from these virtues and acting like leaven. in the loaf of marital happiness, would have taught them lessons filled with greater spiritual truth and beauty than orthodox creeds and Puritan customs.

The ideal wife does not make the ideal husband. When man reaches a marriageable age, his habits have taken firm root, and his tendencies are so closely knit they admit of little stretching. But the ideal wife has a great deal to do with the ideal husbands of the future; for mothers are the women who make men. To them comes the responsibility of laying the corner-stone for future homes or the mockeries of homes. To them comes the opportunity to bend the twig

while it is tender, and start it firm and straight on its upward growth. The ideal mother gives to her sons a heritage of mental, physical and spiritual health, and devotes her energies, during their childhood, to developing that heritage to the full extent. First she teaches them the value of physical health, for this very practical branch of an ethical training is the rock on which the ideal rests. No chronic dyspeptic ever made an ideal husband; and no sufferer from gout ever maintained the moderate temperament essential to the father who would be an example to his sons. Fhysical health is the soil from which spring flowers of mental and spiritual loveliness. From it grow, with a luxuriant naturalness which cultivation cannot bring, cheerfulness, self-control, truth, faith, generous impulse, and poise in the judgment of human nature and human motives.

1

The mistake made by most mothers is in beginning too late. When their idolized offspring have remained out several evenings until ten or eleven, and answer the solicitous "Where have you been?" with an indefinite "Out," a sense of responsibility falls like a blow, and the fond mamas sit them down to think. These reflections usually result in a determinaion to have a talk with Johnny. He's getting to be a big boy now, and serious problems must soon take the place of play. There are things about himself and about the world and his relative position toward it, which he ought to know. Whereupon counsel is taken with Johnny in a good motherly talk, or he is advised of the "things he ought to know" by innuendo, or vague sugges tions, or by well-meant references dropped, now and again, to the examples of other boys' lives. But the motherly intention hits wide of the desired mark. It comes too late. Johnny has already

formed impressions about the "things he ought to know" and booked opinions about a few things more. There is only one thing worse than planting in the desert, and that is planting on overworked ground.

A kindly Providence, however, shields a mother's eyes from the glare of her own errors. She never knows that she stifled the boy's best instincts before he was able to protect himself. She never suspects that the time to prepare him for those "things he ought to know" was when he began to creep over the carpet and cry for something his chubby fists could reach. Nor is she apt to believe that her influence was on the wane when the little leg's got strong enough to play ball and run away from the home-plate. It was then that Johnny found new bases and was governed almost entirely by influences outside his home. His mother is outnumbered. But the amount of pitch that will cling to Johnny when he wades through it, and the amount of good that will sink into his soul when he contacts with it, will be regulated by the discipline of his creeping, toddling years, when his mother drew upon his soul and mind the out-line map of what the future man would be. And Johnny, in the years that follow, will fill in that outline, with a better or worse material, as the case may be, within the limitations of the boundary line his mother set down.

When he begins to think of matrimony, Johnny will have ideais. At least he should have, if he be a normal, wellpoised, progressive young man. His earlier ideals will be transitory. They will hover about a face from which glean eyes of Johnny's favorite color, a tiptilted nose, dimples, curly hair; and perhaps she must have an accomplishment or two--French and German fluently, a gift for music, enough of a voice to sing for his amusement only. And if she possess the crowning glory of knowing how to make apple-duff as mother made it, she will surely be his affinity, and they will be happy ever after.

If the Fates are kind to Johnny, he'll live down his first ideal before anything happens. If they are not, he will probably join the vast multitude that go

down beneath the yoke and count marriage a failure.

For the men who would make ideal husbands must exercise great care in the choosing of their wives. Though wives can not make ideal husbands, they can mar them. One bad woman can ruin more men than twenty good women can redeem; and one mismated, quarrelsome couple can do more hurt to the institution of marriage than can be undone by ten who are quiet and content.

The girl with the curly hair and the dimples and the genius for apple-duff may make a very good wife; but these points will not be a vital factor in her success. Neither will a great fortune or superior social position of itself make life with her for fifty years ideal.

The prospective husband who really is seeking to realize an ideal life must look for inward rather than outward beauty in the girl he marries. Not that outward beauty is worthless. All beauty counts, for beauty, of one kind or another, is the point toward which the ideal is striving. But no woman whose intellect is awakened, whose soul is pure, whose motives are good, whose ambitions are lofty, can possibly be ugly to look at. Beauty is like love, it can not be hidden. When every thought of the mind makes an instant impression on the face, when every good impulse softens the expression and every bad one hardens it, when every smile and every scowl, every tenderness and every harshness, leave their several imprints, can the beauties of the mind and heart be separated from the beauty. of feature? Not only is the woman of ideal type spiritually beautiful, but, inheriting the most graceless and irregular features they must surely acquire a beauty of finesse and expression which will outwear the beauty of feature and increase as the love for good increases in her soul.

Regarding the material conditions that influence matrimony, they are not to be lightly handled. While the marriage can not be ideal without love, which should be its prime incentive, neither can any marriage whose only bond of sympathy is sentimental love, attain perfection. An equal plane, and preferably a high plane, of intellectual understanding is essential.

The bond created by two hearts that grow together through mutual affection is no stronger than the bond that is cemented by the development of two minds progressing along the same lines. of mental activity; particularly when the intellectual affinity is augmented by reciprocated love.

The ideal husband is essentially a provider. The feeling of protection he maintains towards his wife is one of the best feelings he knows. As women prize their gentleness, so men prize their strength. The ideal husband likes to feel that his wife is dependent upon him for happiness, for protection, for maintenance; and the fulfilment of these requirements makes him ideal. The ideal wife will never become so strong in her physical or mental culture that she will not concede to her husband's superior strength. The spirit of dependence upon a man is in every woman; and its degree is regulated by the womanliness within her and the worthiness of her husband.

A good woman will live within her husband's income. A good man will A good man will supply an income sufficient to provide. properly for his wife. And this constitutes another cause why a man should marry a girl in his own set, rather than one who is socially better situated, unless she have an income which she is willing to devote to requirements beyond his means. Many marriages that might otherwise be successful fail because men marry out of their station in life and the impossible burdens they take on plunge them into debt. Ideal marital happiness has no more insidious foe than debt. It eats at the very roots of content; it poisons the whole family tree.

It is only when the practical is neglected that it jars. If we do not wish the squeak of machinery to interfere with the pleasure of our ride, we must oil well the wheels of our motor.

Marriage is a serious business. It's a good deal more serious than dying or

being born. For when we are born our mothers will take care of us, and when we die 'our Father will take care of us. But when we marry, we must take care of ourselves and another besides. The first principle that new responsibility understanding, perfect confidence and perfect faith between man and wife, there can be no sounding of ideals. Seeking the truth, telling the truth, believing the truth-these constitute the basic principle for ethical education, for practical demonstration, for ideal conjugal love. There is nothing so magnificent as the love which knows its power; there is nothing so holy as the love which gives and inspires faith without limit. Ideal love is too noble and too great to be whipped into development by the Scourge of petty jealousy.

Again, we are repeatedly told that women like the brute in man, and cling to men who are their masters. Where do these writers and theorists get their examples? True, Daudet has given us Sappho, whose love reached its exquisite height when she implored her lover to beat and kick her. But Sappho was an animal, and a very bad animal, too. It was not for the Sapphos that me developed from dictators into ideal husbands. It was for those gentle women who are their equals and who love and admire their strength as they recognize it through the tenderness which is its best proof.

This tenderness does not come to all men; but him to whom it does come it makes an ideal husband. It is the acme of every human strength, mental, physi cal and ethical. It is the embodiment of self-control, self-sacrifice, self-annihilation. And it springs into being in that moment when love for a good woman floods him with the realization of love's best purposes, fills him with new hope, new inclinations, new aspirations; and opens up before him a higher plane of living, which the old life could not know.

« PredošláPokračovať »