 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - Počet stránok 812
...party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - Počet stránok 850
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive; and if oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - Počet stránok 874
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - Počet stránok 886
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive; and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public, is void on the grounds of public... | |
 | Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - Počet stránok 520
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...; and if oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - Počet stránok 416
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - Počet stránok 744
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - Počet stránok 730
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - Počet stránok 726
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - Počet stránok 1072
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive ; it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public... | |
| |
... whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection... 
