Obrázky na stránke
PDF
ePub

in consequence of their common attribute of mercy or love." pp. 429, 430.

But it is on that part of the work of Christ, our Redeemer, which consists in advocating our cause with the Father, and sending to his people the gift of his Holy Spirit, that Mr. Gurney dwells with peculiar energy and delight. We quote on this subject what may serve likewise as an instance of his way of applying prophecy.

"It is he who bruises the serpent's head, and destroys the works of the devil: 1 John iii. 8. "The Lord rebuke thee,' said the Angel of the Covenant to satan, when the latter was accusing Joshua the priest The Lord rebuke thee, O satan, even the Lord that hath chosen Jerusalem, rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?' and to Joshua, who was standing before him, clothed in filthy garments,' he said, 'Be hold I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with change of raiment.' Zech. iii. 1-4. May we not collect from this remarkable narration, that the mighty Advocate, who still pleads for his people against their malicious adversary, rests their defence on the atonement made by his own bloodshedding, and graciously covers them with the spotless robe of his own righteousness? Thus it is that the blessings which Christ died to purchase, he lives to apply." pp. 440, 441.

Our author gives, at pp. 453-455, a very happy exposition of the new, the hidden, the spiritual life of a Christian. The connexion between faith and holiness, is also very correctly and admirably stated in what follows.

"I would venture to entreat the reader's attention to the close and intimate associa} tion subsisting between two great doctrines of Christianity, which may indeed be rightly distinguished, but can never be rightly separated-justification through the blood of Christ, and sanctification through his Spirit. In Scripture, these doctrines are very generally treated of conjointly. Both are represented, by the sacred writers, as essential to the work of salvation; both as originating in the boundless mercy of the Father; and both as arising immediately out of the sacrifice of the Son of God. Was Christ set forth' of the Father to be a propitiation through faith in his blood? Did he bear our sins in his own body on the tree?' Did he thus give himself for us? It was not only for the remission of sins that are past, and for the justification of penitent believers, but also that he might sanctify

and cleanse' his church- that he might redeem us from all iniquity'-that our conscience' might be purged from dead works to serve the living God'-' that we, being dead to sin, should live unto righteousness: Heb. ix. 14; 1 Pet. ii. 24. It is much to be desired that a holy caution should more and more prevail among Christians, lest, by dwelling on either of these doctrines, to the exclusion of the other, they should lose the balance of Divine truth, for, although persons who are accustomed to commit this dangerous practical error may participate in some of the joys, and experience some of the virtue, of true religion, they cannot fail to fall very short of a just apprehension and harmony, and the completeness of the satisfying enjoyment of the beauty, the Gospel dispensation." pp. 456, 457.

Our readers may wish to see, whether our author's description of the work of the Holy Spirit be altogether free from any tinge of the very peculiar notions which have been entertained by many, though, we trust, now, by a decreasing number of the Society of which he is a member. The following paragraph will, we think, satisfy them on this head.

66

Examples may probably sometimes occur of the very rapid, and even sudden production, of that revolution in the sentiments and affections of fallen man which has now been depicted, and of which the beginning only can be properly described as a new birth. Such an example is afforded by the history of the Apostle Paul, who, within the compass of one short journey, was first a persecutor of the Christians, and afterwards a preacher of Christianity;-who left Jerusalem, the proud, furious, sanguinary, bigot,—and entered Damascus the subdued and contrite believer, prepared to be an instrument of honour in his Master's hands, for the most extensive propagation of the Gospel, which any individual has ever been the means of effecting. But, in general, this vital change is very gradual, and its precise commencement, as well as the daily progress of its growth, are often impalpable alike to the regenerate man himself, and to the persons by whom he is surrounded. So is the kingdom of God, as if a man should cast seed into the ground, and should sleep, and rise night and day, and the seed should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how. For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear: Mark iv. 26-28. All that we can, for the most part, safely say on the subject is this; that, as the vital principle of religion-the immortal seed

of the kingdom-springs up and unfolds itself in the heart of the believer, the celestial plant is known by its fruits.

[ocr errors]

-

During the progress of the work of religion -a work, in general, slow and gradual of which the commencement is regeneration, and the end salvation, it cannot be denied, that the individual who has been really quickened by the Spirit, and is therefore born again, is nevertheless exposed to many seasons of doubt and darkness, and wages a painful and often unequal warfare with the infirmity and corruptions of the flesh, with the temptations of the world, and with the power of the enemy. Such a warfare is described, in affecting terms, by the Apostle Paul: We know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do, I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I ...........I delight in the law of God after the inward man. But I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin, which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The answer to this question was, I thank God, or according to another reading of the Greek text, the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord;' and this answer introduces the full enunciation of that glorious doctrine already adverted to, that the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus 'makes free from the law of sin and death'

-that,' what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God, sending his own Son, in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled (or completed) in us who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit: Rom. vii. 14-25; viii. 2-4.

"Although, therefore, the conflict between the flesh and the Spirit, which strive within us, and are contrary the one to the other, is often long continued, and perhaps is seldom entirely finished, [never] until the moment when the thread of the Christian's life is cut, and death is swallowed up in victory, we ought, nevertheless, to be consoled and encouraged under the assurance that Divine Grace is omnipotent, and to press forwards with holy diligence and magnanimity towards the only practical standard proposed to us by the Gospel -the standard of uninterrupted piety, charity, and holiness." pp. 466-468.

One sentence more we cannot re

frain from extracting, for the value of the sentiment it contains.

"It requires peculiar watchfulness that we do not attempt to lay claim to the consolations of religion, while we continue in our sins. It is an unalterable truth, that without holiness none shall see God: and

in considering the operations of the Holy

Spirit, it is above all things to be remembered, that notwithstanding the weakness of the flesh and the power of temptation, he is our all-powerful, all-sufficient, Sanctifier. The Scriptures afford us every encouragement to believe that those who walk in the light, and dwell under the influence of the Spirit, and who submit with patience to the work of that Holy One of Israel, who is so justly compared by the prophet to the refiner's fire' and the fuller's soap,' (Mal. iii. 2,) are gradually delivered from the power of iniquity. By the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost,' they are actually 'saved' from sin." pp. 473, 474.

6

Such is the scheme of Christian doctrine, which Mr. Gurney has brought before his readers. It furnishes a large view of what we learn from the Scriptures concerning God and man, given with sobriety, discrimination, and skill; manifesting, in the statement of it, a truly catholic spirit; exhibiting very considerable research and learning, and written with much propriety and taste. Still there are a very few passages in these valuable Essays, on which we have one or two observations to make, in the way of exception. The first passage to which we refer is one in which Mr. Gurney raises a question upon the memorable text of Matt. xxviii. 19, 20, and intimates, though only casually and in transition, a doubt whether the participle baptizing is to be understood

[ocr errors]

as denoting merely the sign of conversion, or the act of converting itself." p. 151. This is the single passage to which we have already alluded as the only one in which, perhaps, any peculiarity of a sectarian creed discloses itself. To our minds the question, whether baptizing in this command means any thing else than that form of ablution which the Apostles in complying with it uniformly practised, is quite superfluous; more especially, as the idea of converting all nations or making them the disciples of Christ, and that of teaching them also whatever they must do to be saved, are mentioned before and after the passage.

There is another sentence in Mr. Gurney's work on which a similar

remark may be made, and then we have done with all exceptions of this nature. It is where the author distinguishes the dispensations of God into three; namely, "the Jewish, the Baptismal, and the Christian dispensations." p. 307. This is a phra seology which breathes of the same peculiarity of opinion; namely, that which denies the appointment of baptism, in the customary sense of the word, to the Christian church. We cannot, however, but pronounce it unscriptural to call the dispensation of John the Baptismal dispensation, in opposition to the Jewish and the Christian; inasmuch as the Christian dispensation is eminently baptismal, and its baptism is distinguished from the baptism of John. See, in proof of this, Matt. xxviii. 19; Mark xvi. 16; Acts xix. 3-5. As for John's dispensation, it was a peculiar, intermediate, transitionary, and perhaps ambiguous, state of the church. It partook in some measure of both the others, and ought not to be alleged as a separate and distinct covenant. See Luke xvi. 16.

We have observed a good deal of confusion in different writers when

they treat of the eternity ascribed in Scripture to different things; some of which are not of a nature, or were not originally designed, to last for ever. In these cases, it is generally said, that eternity is ascribed to the subjects to which it is applied in a restricted or subordinate sense, instead of being ascribed to them in its proper sense, so far as their nature will admit it. Thus, when our author says, "if we read, that a human dynasty is to endure for ever, we naturally understand the expression for ever,' as relating only to a long and indefinite duration," p. 201; we should rather be inclined to understand from that statement, that it was to endure as long as the human species endure, and therefore absolutely for ever, if the human species were to continue for ever. For this reason we are not prepared to admit, that "neither the Greek

nor the Hebrew language supply any single word which unequivocally and uniformly denotes a proper eternity." p. 200. The ideas of neverending belongs properly both to y and to awwvios, though, when applied to subjects which have an end, they are robbed of a part of their natural force by that unequal connexion.

We are also habitually on our guard against hasty corrections of our Authorized Version. Mr. Gurney thus comments upon the declaration of our Lord in Mark ii. 10:

[ocr errors]

"He continued to assert his own power on earth (or rather over the earth') to forgive sins'; επι της γης. Ear thus used in connexion with soura, (whether followed by an accusative, or by a dative) signifies not in but over: vide Luke ix. 1; 1 Cor. xi. 10; Apoc. ii. 26, xi. 6, xiii. 7, xiv. 18." 270. P.

Dative is here probably a misprint pared, however, are not parallel: for genitive. The passages comfor En Tus yns in Mark ii. 10, is not used in connexion with εovora, but

with apuvat, between which word and its object, àμaprias, it is interposed.

It must therefore be translated " upon earth," as in the common version.

From our review of Mr. Holden's

treatise, in a late Number, it will be following positions concerning the inferred, that we dissent from the law of the Sabbath.

"There is perhaps no article in the Mosaic code on which so frequent a stress is laid, both in the Pentateuch and in the writings of the Prophets, as that which respected the punctual observance of the Sabbath as a day of absolute rest. Yet, that our Saviour, in relation to this particular, not only reproved the unauthorized superstition of the Jews, but intro.. duced a material relaxation of the strictness of the Divine law, is indicated by a variety of passages in the New Testament, and is evidently confirmed by the history of the early Christian church; the express principle on which he thus taught Man' was Lord, even of the Sabbathand acted being this-that the Son of day.'" p. 271.

The instances, cited by our Saviour, of a guiltless deviation from the strict letter of the Sabbatical law, are all taken from the history of the Israelites themselves under

the Law, Matt. xii. 3-5; and therefore they sanction no other principle than this, that the less imperious duty must give place to the greater. We conceive that our Lord only restored this and other laws to their original simplicity.

These, however, are subordinate points in a connected view of doctrine, which ranges over too great a variety of matter to admit of universal agreement in all its details. On the general merit of this part of the work we have spoken already, and must now hasten to the only remaining essay, which treats of the practical duties of faith and obedience.

On the reasonableness of faith, as a principle of action, we meet with many valuable observations. (p. 489, et seq.)-The conclusion from the whole matter is,

"That the only standard of action, enjoined on us in the Bible, is obedience to the revealed will or law of God-that

this obedience constitutes righteousness; and the contrary to it, sin-that God has written his moral law on the hearts of all men; or, in other words, has interwoven a sense of it with their very nature-that,

independently of this universal principle, he has, in all ages of the world, maintained for himself a visible church, consisting of persons who have received an external revelation of his will-that, under the Mosaic dispensation, the moral law was specified and recorded in writing. that a vast variety of ceremonial and other positive precepts were also enjoined on the Israelites and their ancestorsthat whatsoever is the nature of the Lord's commandments, the duty universally required of those to whom they are addressed, is unqualified obedience-that such obedience must ever be grounded on faith, and that faith without it is absolutely dead-that under the dispensation of Christianity, the moral law of God is so far from being abrogated, that it is fully confirmed, and unfolded in all its strength and perfection-that the motives to obedience with which the Gospel furnishes us, are of so powerful and exalted a nature, that they are practically adequate to the extent and purity of the service which such a law requires-and, lastly, that the aid of the Holy Spirit never will be withheld from those who seek it, but will enable them to bear the fruit of righteousness, and to perfect holiness in the fear of God." pp. 557, 558.

Our limits will not allow us to transcribe any more of the very im

portant statements in the closing essay before us. In discussing, however, these practical lessons, some remarks incidentally occur, which perhaps may admit of a question, For instance, in defining the respective provinces of faith and reason. the author says;

"Faith and reason, in religion, obviously interfere with one another, when we believe in some propositions which have no foundation in reason, or when we reason upon others which are the proper subjects only of faith." p. 498.

But objects of faith have their foundation not in reason, but in revelation; and the province of reason in respect to them is to determine, whether they have been revealed, (which perhaps is indeed what Mr. Gurney means by "having their foundation in reason;" reason having decided on the proofs of their authority; and if so we agree with him,) whether, according to the terms of the revelation, we are among the persons who have a right to repose faith in them, with similar points. There are consequently no truths which are in such a sense

the proper subjects only of faith that we can never with propriety reason upon them. We must reason upon them in order to know, whether they are indeed objects of faith; and reason is only then misplaced in regard to them, when it seeks to mould, according to its own conclusions, matters which are not subjected to its grasp; and of which it can only decide with propriety, whether they indeed are what they profess to be. Reason is our optical instrument, by which we determine the situation, dimensions, and laws of those lofty stars of the firmament. But it would not enable us to discern such distant objects without the possession of another faculty, to which it is a very humble, though a very useful, and for these purposes a necessary, auxiliary. Another proposition of the author may be doubted, wherein he remarks,

"Although the moral law of God is, in its nature, eternal and unchangeable, it may, I think, be concluded from the

records of Scripture, that the revelation of it to mankind has been gradually progressive." p. 526.

The discoveries of prophecy are progressive; but the moral law of God may have been made known to Adam with as much clearness as to ourselves, and have only become obscure in after ages through the operation of that cause to which our Saviour refers it: " Men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil."

We think also, that Mr. Gurney in some places speaks of natural religion in terms which imply, that it is a separate source of light and knowledge, instead of being, what we hold it to be, the groping of a benighted mind after a light which has in a great measure forsaken it.

But, as we have before remarked, these are but trifling specks in a work which is both luminous and

comprehensive. We hail it, as an example of unprejudiced discussion upon topics which are too apt to divide even good men, but on which agreement would be more attainable, if the love of disputation and the spirit of party were withdrawn. We hail it not only for the information it contains, but for the spirit which it breathes. We hail it also, as the commencement, we trust-of the return, shall we say? or of the adherence--of at least a large body of the society, whom the author may be said to represent, to those sounder views of Divine revelation and spiritual influence which we consider essen

tial to sobriety and truth: and in that hope we cordially recommend to that esteemed and respected society, an attention to the maxim contained and implied in the following sentence, with which we close our extracts from the volume before us: "That of the Scriptures, considered as a whole, God is the primary author-that the account which they contain of religious truth, rests on the authority of the Supreme Being-and, therefore, that the person who searches for that which is re

vealed, may safely direct his unhesitating

attention to that which is written." p. 544.

The History of the Reformation of the Church of England. By HENRY SOAMES, M. A. Rector of Shelley, in Essex. Vols. 1 and 2, Reign of Henry VIII. Rivingtons. 1826. 8vo. pp. 518 and 647.

Anne Boleyn, a Dramatic Poem. By the Rev. H. H. MILMAN, Professor of Poetry in the University of Oxford. Murray. 1826. 8vo. pp. 168.

THE reign of Henry VIII. embraces events which have vitally affected the salutary influence of which has the happiness of England; events, not yet ceased, and, we trust, never will cease to operate, not only on herself and on the continent of

Europe, but, we might add, on the whole habitable globe.

undoubtedly the period at which, The reign of Henry VIII. was in this favoured land, may be said to have commenced the Reformation of our national church from the errors of Popery: and therefore we look back to it, with something should look back to a period in our of the same feelings with which we own private history, when our minds may have undergone some remarkable revolution, and when we may have been led, by the force of some power, gradually to abandon our new and attractive, but irresistible, long cherished and deeply rooted each successive writer, who principles and habits. We welcome unravel to us the steps and instruments of this process of graduation, and develop the secret springs by which its ascendency was secured, and its consummation effected. Much of our gratification, however, must necessarily depend on the views and principles, as well as the merely intellectual qualifications, of

can

the individual who undertakes to retrace the events of the Reformation. Habits of research and powers of discrimination, are not the only requisites for the satisfactory eluci

dation of the recorded annals of a

« PredošláPokračovať »