Obrázky na stránke
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

ner anons, the Expo Sam in Ha wall is were resized, and the Lady Cus accent, vien in the end was amended with uneet if a mass fir a Morte mas festivity, Het was woontet (mather, as I apprehend, en de perious adventure in Haywood I must have been sun fer. The Se Jen Ervitus has also observed, that La tectal je SICA II saman í virk, the uch less par*is ( lose,” mi v. p. 12 Lawes, la his are alus a te arded a stating that the + ISIS sa fira 7am tumsed, and others of his moble

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

The Earl's affection for his wife, and regret for her loss, even till his death were extreme +.

John, third Earl of Bridgewater, died 23rd May, 1716, aged sixty-one.

His son Scroop, fourth earl, having married Lady Elizabeth Churchill, one of the coheirs of the famous John, Duke of Marlborough, was raised to a dukedom 18th June, 1720 she died however in her twenty-sixth year, before this promotion, on 22nd March, 1714. The duke died 11th January, 1745; his eldest son John, by his marriage with Lady Rachel Russell, succeeded, and died 26th February, 1748, aged twenty-one. He was succeeded by his only brother, Francis, third and last duke, who died ummarried, 1803, aged sixty-seven. This was the celebrated founder of canal navigation.

General John William Egerton, grandson of Henry, bishop of Hereford, who died 1746, fifth son of John, third Earl of Bridgewater, succeeded to the earldom. His father was Bishop of Durham, and married, in 1748, Lady Anne Sophia Gray, daughter of Henry, last Duke of Kent of that family: he died 1823, and was succeeded by his brother, the Rev. Francis Henry Egerton, who died at Paris, unmarried, 1829.

Lady Louisa Egerton, born 30th April, 1723, sister of the whole blood to the last Duke of Bridgewater, married 28th March, 1748, Granville Levison, afterwards Earl Gower, and created Marquis of Stafford, whose son by her, the second Marquis of Stafford, was latterly created Duke of Sutherland, and was father of the present Duke of Sutherland and of Lord Francis Gower, on whom the Duke of Bridgewater entailed a large portion of his immense property, in consequence of which he has now assumed the name of Egerton.

Sophia Egerton, sister of the last two earls, married Sir Abraham Hume, bart., and left two daughters, of whom one married the Earl of Brownlow, and was mother of the present Lord Alford; and the other married Mr. Charles Long, created Lord Farnborough ; but without issue.

I would not have gone into these dry genealogical details, if the title had not now disappeared from the modern peerages.

On the illustrious founder of canal navigation, a great national benefactor, it is unnecessary to enlarge: perhaps he did not take the literary turn of his ancestors, which, if not more useful, would have been more congenial to the pursuits which I admire. He was a man of retired, and somewhat eccentric habits; and wrapped up exclusively in the mighty works which he was meditating, and carrying on. He was not a man of visionary talents; and cared little, I believe, about the history of his ancestors, or the glories of past times: he felt no interest in the curious library §, amassed by his forefathers, nor in the long galleries of the portraits of the great chancellor's Elizabethan contemporaries. His ancient mansion of Ashridge, which before the Reformation had been a monastery, he suffered to fall to decay, inhabiting only a few rooms in the porter's lodge |.

See, in "Censura Literaria," an account of George Wither's "Hallelujah," with the manuscript notes of this Earl's own copy.

f I have mentioned the funeral certificate by the heralds: their inaccuracy is always proverbial. The earl survived his son Thomas a year; yet though the son's marriage and issue are given, no notice is taken of his death. I found it in a memorandum in an account-book of his widow. Afterwards I found, by Clutterbuck's "History of Hertfordshire," that he was buried at Little Gadsden, in the family vault. His widow, Esther Busby, survived till 1724.

The first Duke of Bridgewater had a daughter by his first lady, who first married Wriothesly Russell, third Duke of Bedford, who died 1732, without issue; and afterwards William Villiers, Earl of Jersey, from which marriage the present Earl of Jersey is descended.

From the use of this library Mr. Todd derived a great part of his bibliographical knowledge in old English poetry, and of the predecessors and contemporaries of Milton: many of the volumes had probably gone through the hands of the illustrious poet.

II visited it in August 1789, and took a hasty list of the portraits. See" Topographer," 1789,

1790, 8vo. four vols.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

General John Egerton, who succeeded to the earldom and ancient portion of the Bridgewater estates, inherited none of the old family love of literature. He was of manners chillingly cold, and a reserved pride, mixed with something of concealed sarcasm, which was apt to give great offence: he piqued himself upon his proprie. ties, and would never do any thing out of rule or fashion: he rebuilt the mansion of Ashridge most magnificently, but was fond of money, and over-thrifty in many of his habits. He never had any children, but left the principal property to his widow for her life, who still enjoys it.

His brother and successor, Francis Henry Egerton, was prebendary of Durham, and rector of the rich family living of Whitchurch in Shropshire. For about twenty of the last years of his life he resided at Paris, having bought the grand hotel of the Ducs de Noailles, between the Rue St. Honoré and the Rue de Rivoli, where he lived at a great expense, and in much pomp. He was a strange man, the reverse of his brother: an admirable classical scholar, a great lover of books, with many flashes of genius, and fitful acts of generosity and munificence: in short, many of his habits were so singular as only to be accounted for by the obliquities of mental disease, By his will he became a public benefactor, enriching the library of the British Museum, and leaving a large sum to be expended in the authorship and publication of what have since appeared under the title of the "Bridgewater Treatises." He delighted in the history of his family, and the glory of his ancestors: he caused to be printed a translation of "Comus,” in Italian verse; and was at the expense of many other privately-printed gifts to literature. It cannot be denied that he was both vain and proud: but let his learning, his talents, and acts of public benefit veil his foibles.

Lord Francis Gower, now Egerton, who represents and possesses a magnificent portion of the Bridgewater property, with the library, splendid collection of pictures, · and other reliques, embellishes his descent by his literary accomplishments, his genius, and his devotion to the Muses.

Thus has passed away the male line of this illustrious family. The length of Mr. Todd's note, in his Milton, upon the subject, has set me an example which will apologize for my substituting in its room another which fills less space. Considering the early connexion of Milton with this house, and that hence came the exquisite mask of “ Comus,” I venture to hope that it will not be deemed irrelevant. Descent is nothing unless it stimulates to accomplish the mind with high decorations, to nurse high pursuits, and to cherish high emotions of the heart. Who sleeps upon his honours-who relies only on reflected glory, is an imbecile and culpable cipher.

* I believe that only five males are now living, who are half Egertons, viz., whose mothers were Egertons, of whom my brother and myself are two. Lord Francis is only an Egerton by his paternal grandmother; the same is the case with Mr. Egerton of Tatton.

ΤΟ

[ocr errors]

THE RIGHT HONOURABLE JOHN LORD VISCOUNT BRACLY,

MY LORD,

SON AND HEIR APPARENT TO THE EARL OF BRIDGEWATER, &c.b

Tuis poem, which received its occasion of birth from yourself and others of your noble family, and much honour from your own person in the performance, now returns again to make a finall dedication of itself to you. Although not openly acknowledged by the author, yet it is a legitimate offspring, so lovely, and so much desired, that the often copying of it hath tired my pen to give my severall friends satisfaction, and brought me to a necessity of producing it to the publike view; and now to offer it up in all rightfull devotion to those fair hopes, and rare endowments of your much promising youth, which give a full assurance, to all that know you, of a future excellence. Live, sweet Lord, to be the honour of your name, and receive this as your own, from the hands of him, who hath by many favours been long obliged to your most honoured parents; and as in this representation your attendant Thyrsis, so now in all reall expression Your faithfull and most humble servant,

H. LAWES d.

This is the dedication to Lawes's edition of the Mask, 1637, to which the following motto was prefixed, from Virgil's second Eclogue:

Eheu! quid volui misero mihi? floribus austrum
Perditus-

This motto is omitted by Milton himself in the editions of 1645 and 1673.-T. Warton.
This motto is delicately chosen, whether we consider it as being spoken by the author himself,
or by the editor. If by the former, the meaning, I suppose, is this:-" I have, by giving way to
this publication, let in the breath of public censure on these early blossoms of my poetry, which
were before secure in the hands of my friends, as in a private enclosure." If we suppose it to
come from the editor, the application is not very different; only to floribus we must then give
an encomiastic sense. The choice of such a motto, so far from vulgar in itself, and in its appli-
cation, was worthy Milton.-HURD.

b The first brother in the Mask.-T. WARTON.

< It never appeared under Milton's name till the year 1645.-T. WARTON.

d This dedication does not appear in the edition of Milton's poems, printed in 1673, when Lord Brackley, under the title of Earl of Bridgewater, was still living. Milton was perhaps unwilling to own his early connexions with a family, conspicuous for its unshaken loyalty, and now highly patronised by King Charles II-T. WARTON.

Milton in his edition of 1673 omitted also the letter written by Sir Henry Wootton: yet it has not been supposed that, by withdrawing the letter, he intended any disrespect to the memory of his learned friend; nor might the dedication perhaps have been withdrawn through any unwillingness to own his early connexions with the Egerton family: it might have been inexpedient for him at that time openly to avow them; but he would not, I think, forget them. He had lived in the neighbourhood of Ashridge, the seat of the Earl of Bridgewater: for his father's house and lands at Horton near Colnbrook, in Buckinghamshire, were held under the earl, before whom "Comus" was acted. Milton afterwards lived in Barbican, where the earl had great property, as well as his town residence, Bridgewater-house: and though Dr. Johnson observes that Milton "had taken a larger house in Barbican for the reception of scholars," it is not improbable that he might have been accommodated with it rent-free, by that nobleman, who, it may be supposed, would gladly embrace an opportunity of having in his neighbourhood the admirable author of "Comus," and of promoting his acquaintance with that finished scholar, who, being "willing," says his nephew Phillips, "to impart his learning and knowledge to his relations, and the sons of gentlemen who were his intimate friends," might afford to his family at least the pleasure of his conversation, if not to some of them the advantage of his instruction. This dedication does not appear in Tickell's and Fenton's editions of Milton's poetical works. It was restored by Dr. Newton.-TODD.

Henry Lawes, who composed the music for "Comus," and performed the combined characters of the Spirit and the shepherd Thyrsis in this drama, was the son of Thomas Lawes, a vicar choral of Salisbury cathedral: he was perhaps at first a choir-boy of that church. With his brother William, he was educated in music under Giovanni Coperario, (supposed by Fenton, in his notes on Waller, to be an Italian, but really an Englishman under the plain name of John

M M

THE COPY OF A LETTER WRITTEN BY SIR HENRY WOOTTON, TO THE AUTHOR, UPON THE FOLLOWING POEM.

From the Colledge, this 13. of April, 1633¢.

SIR, It was a special favour, when you lately bestowed upon me here the first taste of your acquaintance, though no longer then to make me know that I wanted more time to value it, and to enjoy it rightly; and in truth, if I could then have imagined your farther stay in these parts, which I understood afterwards by Mr. H., I would have been bold, in our vulgar phrase, to mend my draught (for you left me with an extreme thirst) and to have begged your conversation again, joyntly with your said learned friend, at a poor meal or two, that we might have banded together som good authors of the ancient time; among which, I observed you to have been familiar.

Since your going, you have charged me with new obligations, both for a very kinde letter from you dated the sixth of this month, and for a dainty peece of entertainment which came therwith: wherin I should much commend the tragical part, if the lyrical did not ravish me with a certain Dorique delicacy in your songs and odes; wherunto I must plainly confess to have seen yet nothing parallel in our language: ipsa mollities h. But I must not omit to tell you, that I now Cooper,) at the expense of Edward, Earl of Hertford. In January 1625, he was appointed pistoler, or epistoler, of the royal chapel; in November following he became one of the gentle men of the choir of that chapel; and soon afterwards, clerk of the cheque, and one of the courtmusicians to King Charles I.

Cromwell's usurpation put an end to masks and music: and Lawes, being dispossessed of all his appointments, by men who despised and discouraged the elegances and ornaments of life. chiefly employed that gloomy period in teaching a few young ladies to sing and play on the lute. Yet he was still greatly respected: for before the troubles began, his irreproachable life, ingenuous deportment, engaging manners, and liberal connexions, had not only established his character, but raised even the credit of his profession. Wood says, that his most beneficent friends, during his sufferings for the royal cause, in the rebellion and afterwards, were the ladies Alice and Mary, the Earl of Bridgewater's daughters before mentioned; but in the year 1660, he was restored to his places and practice; and had the happiness to compose the coronation anthem for the exiled monarch. He died in 1662, and was buried in Westminster Abbey. Of all the testimonies paid to his merit by his contemporaries, Milton's commendation in the thirteenth Sonnet, and in some of the speeches of "Comus," must be esteemed the most honour able; and Milton's praise is likely to be founded on truth. Milton was no specious or necasional flatterer; and at the same time was a skilful performer on the organ, and a judge of music; and it appears probable, that even throughout the rebellion, he had continued his friendship for Lawes; for, long after the king was restored, he added the sonnet to Lawes in the new edition of his Poems, printed under his own direction, in 1673. Nor has our author only complimented Lawes's excellences in music; for in "Comus," having said that Thyrsis, with his "soft pipe," and "smooth-dittied song," could "still the roaring winds and hush the waving woods," he adds, v. 88, "nor of less faith: " and he joins his worth with his skill, Son. xiii. v. 5.—TODD. e April 1638. Milton had communicated to Sir Henry his design of seeing foreign countries, and had sent him his "Mask." He set out on his travels soon after the receipt of this letter. See the account of his life.-TODD.

Mr. H. Mr. Warton, in his first edition of "Comus," says, that Mr. H. was "perhaps Milton's friend, Samuel Hartlib, whom I have seen mentioned in some of the pamphlets of this period, as well acquainted with Sir Henry Wootton:" but this is omitted in the second edition Mr. Warton perhaps doubted his conjecture of the person. I venture to state, from a copy of the "Reliquia Wottoniana" in my possession, in which a few notes are written, (probably soon after the publication of the book, 3rd edit. in 1672,) that the person intended was the " ever memorable" John Hales. This information will be supported by the reader's recollecting Sir Henry's intimacy with Mr. Hales: of whom Sir Henry says, in one of his letters, that he gave ta his learned friend the title of bibliotheca ambulans, "the walking library." See "Reliq. Wotton." 3rd edit. p. 475.-TODD.

The tragical part. Sir Henry, now provost of Eton college, was himself a writer of English odes, and with some degree of elegance: he had also written a tragedy, while a young student at Queen's-college, Oxford, called "Tancredo," acted by his fellow-students. See his "Life," by Walton, p. 11. He was certainly a polite scholar, but on the whole a mixed and desultory character: he was now indulging his studious and philosophic propensities at leisure. Milton, when this letter was written, lived but a few miles from Eton.-T. WARTON.

h Ipsa mollities. Thus Fletcher's "Faithful Shepherdess" is characterised by Cartwright, "where softness reigns." Poems, p. 209. ed. 1651. But Sir Henry's conceptions did not reach to

« PredošláPokračovať »