International Law in South AfricaStevens and Haynes, 1900 - 127 strán (strany) This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. |
Vyhľadávanie v obsahu knihy
Výsledky 1 - 5 z 19.
... ports Great Britain was blockading . Imagine North and South England at war , Scotland an independent neutral kingdom , and a vessel coming from Norway with goods for Liverpool slipping up the CONTRABAND FOR NEUTRAL PORTS . 9.
... Britain , when at war with the Batavian Republic , and blockading its coasts , as most irritating . To patrol , with such vigilance , the Dutch coast , and then to have goods quietly planted at Emden , ready to slip in across the ...
... Britain . It was naturally interpreted as a British statute would have been . But a still more serious point , in which the analogy fails to support the novel doctrine of the French and United States Courts , is the destination of the ...
... Britain has no right to place that fetter on the commerce of Portugal , which would be riveted on it if we could seize goods bound for Delagoa Bay . A little reflection will show how very seriously such a course would prejudice the ...
... Britain had ever refused to accept the decision in the Springbok . On the contrary , she had expressly refused to protest against , or enter any objection to it . Earl Russell's disclaimer of the new doctrine ( Hansard , 18 May , 1863 ) ...