time, and misspent our gotten treasure. How curious were we to please our lady, how carelesse to displease our Lord. How devout in serving our goddesse, how desperate in forgetting our God! Ah my Philautus, if the wasting of our money might not dehort us, yet the wounding of our minds should deterre us; if reason might nothing perswade us to wisdom, yet shame should prouoke us to wit. If there bee any man in despire to obtain his purpose or obstinate in his opinion, that hauing lost his freedome by folly, would also lose his life for loue, let him repair hither, and he shall reape such profit as will either quench his flames or asswage his furie, eyther cause him to renounce his lady as most pernitious or redeeme his libertie as most precious. Come therefore to me all ye lovers that haue been deceived by fancie, the glasse of pestilence; or deluded by women, the gate of perdition: be as earnest to seeke a medicine, as you were eager to runne into mischiefe. This is therefore to admonish all young imps and nouises in loue not to blow the coales of fancy with desire but to quench them with disdaine. The first sip of loue is pleasant, the second perrillous, the third pestilent. Though the beginning bring delight, the end bringeth destruction. Euphues, by John Lily. The influence of euphuism is seen in much of the poetry of the latter part of the sixteenth century, sometimes in the phraseology, sometimes only in the thoughts. The following are specimens: Delightfull and Daintie Devises. You mery mates that maske it out in myrth, You that are fed with Fancy from your byrth, And rockt to rest with sirens' sugred songes. Draw neere a while and or you boast or bragge, Wherein you may be warned by my wyll And shun the baytes that brittle bewtie breedes: Three Collections of Poetry, 1579, Roxburghe Club, The perfect Trial of a faithful Friend. Doth truly try the frien from foe: Paradise of Dainty Devices. ELLIS's Specimens, ii., 121. So. Falke Greville, Lord Brooke, 1554-1628. (Handbook, par.137.) The most difficult of all our poets.' No writer appears to have reflected more deeply on momentous subjects. Imagination. Knowledge's next organ is imagination; As makes her pictures still too foul, or fair; This power, besides, always cannot receive So must th' imagination from the sense False shapes and forms on their intelligence, Hence our desires, fears, hopes, love, hate, and sorrow, Reality of a True Religion. For sure in all kinds of hypocrisy No bodies yet are found of constant being; No uniform, no stable mystery, No inward nature, but an outward seeming; No solid truth, no virtue, holiness, But types of these, which time makes more or less. And, from these springs, strange inundations flow, With massacres, conspiracy, treason, woe, By sects and schisms profaning Deity: Besides, with furies, fiends, earth, air, and hell, But, as there lives a true God in the heaven, Such as we are to him, to us is he, Without God there was no man ever good; Divine the author and the matter be, Where goodness must be wrought in flesh and blood: But virtues that descend have heavenly wings. A Treatise of Relig 61. Sir Philip Sidney, 1554-1586. (Handbook, pars. 91, 122.) About 1580 some violent attacks were made on music and poetry, in all their forms: Gorson, and other pamphleteers, holding that a poem and a lie were the same. Sidney's Defence is a logical and earnest reply that has permanent interest. Defence of Poesy. Is it then the Pastoral Poem which is misliked (for, perchance, where the hedge is lowest, they will soonest leap over), is the poor pipe disdained, which sometimes out of Melibus' mouth, can show the misery of people under hard lords and ravening soldiers? And again, by Tityrus, what blessedness is derived to them that lie lowest, from the goodness of them that sit highest? Sometimes under the pretty tales of wolves and sheep, can include the whole considerations of wrong doing and patience: sometimes show that contentions for trifles can get but a trifling victory. . . . Or is it the lamenting Elegiac, which in a kind heart, would move rather pity than blame, who bewaileth, with the great philosopher Heraclitus, the weakness of mankind, and the wretchedness of the world; who surely is to be praised, either for compassionately accompanying just cause of lamentations, or for rightly pointing out how weak be the passions of wofulness? Is it the bitter, but wholesome lambic, who rubs the galled mind, in making shame the trumpet of villany, with bold and open crowing out against naughtiness? Or the Satiric, who 'Omne vafer vitium ridenti tangit amico,' a who sportingly never leaveth, until he make a man laugh at folly, and at length, ashamed to laugh at himself; which he cannot avoid, without avoiding the folly? who, while circum præcordia ludit (he plays about the heart), giveth us to feel how many head-aches a passionate life bringeth to ?.... No, perchance it is the Comic, whom naughty play-makers and stage-keepers have justly made odious. To the arguments of abuse, I will after answer; only this much now is to be said, that the comedy is an imitation of the common errors of our life, which he representeth in the most ridiculous and scornful sort • Slily touches the faults of his friend, who laughs the while. that may be so as it is impossible that any beholder can be content to be such a one. Now, as in geometry the oblique must be known as well as the right, and in arithmetic the odd as well as the even; so, in the actions of our life, who seeth not the filthiness of evil, wanteth a great foil to perceive the beauty of virtue. And much less of the high and excellent Tragedy, that openeth the greatest wounds, and showeth forth the ulcers that are covered with tissue; that maketh kings fear to be tyrants, and tyrants to manifest their tyrannical humours; that, with stirring the affections of admiration and commiseration, teacheth the uncertainty of this world, and upon how weak foundations gilded roofs are builded: that maketh us know, Qui sceptra sœvus duro imperio regit, Timet timentes; metus in authorem redit.a . . . Is it the Lyric that most displeaseth, who, with his tuned lyre and well-accorded voice, giveth praise, the reward of virtue, to virtuous acts? who giveth moral precepts and natural problems? who sometimes raiseth up his voice to the height of the heavens, in singing the lauds of the immortal God? Certainly, I must confess mine own barbarousness, I never heard the old song of Percy and Douglas, that I found not my heart moved more than with a trumpet: and yet is it sung but by some blind crowder, with no rougher voice than rude stile: which being so evil apparelled in the dust and cobweb of that uncivil age, what would it work trimmed in the gorgeous eloquence of Pindar?... There rests the Heroical, whose very name, I think, should daunt all back biters. For by what conceit can a tongue be directed to speak evil of that which draweth with him no less champions than Achilles, Cyrus, Eneas, Turnus, Tydeus, Rinaldo? Who doth not only teach and move to truth, but teacheth and moveth to the most high and excellent truth? Who maketh magnanimity and justice shine through all misty fearfulness and foggy desires? Who, if the saying of Plato and Tully be true, that who could see virtue would be wonderfully ravished with the love of her beauty, this man setteth her out, to make her more lovely, in her holiday apparel, to the eye of any that will deign not to disdain until they understand. But, ■ The crnel prince who sways the sceptre of a severe government, fears those whe fear him, and terror returns upon its author. The Ballad of Chevy Chase. |