Obrázky na stránke
PDF
ePub

impossibility, it was to set reason, nature and God at defiance, to suppose, that, without marrying, the priests could preserve their purity.

This is a fact notorious in every part of the world whither the sound of the words Catholic and Protestant has reached. Well, then, if this objection to the Catholic church were well founded, what becomes of the powers of that “moral restraint," which these speakers of "lies in hypocrisy," have now, all of a sudden, discovered for the use of the whole body of the labouring classes of this kingdom? If men, few in number, educated for the purpose of the ministry, bound by the most solemn vows of chastity, jealous to the last degree, for the reputation of their order, practising fasting and abstinence, early and late in their churches, visiting constantly the sick, superstitious in their minds, having the awful spectacle of death almost daily under their eyes, and clothed in a garb which of itself was a deep mortification and an antidote to passion in the beholders; if such men could not contain; if it were deemed impossible for such men to restrain themselves; and, if this impossibility were one of the grounds for overturning a

[ocr errors]

church that had existed amongst our fathers for six hundred years, what hypocrites must the reformers of this church have been! or, what hypocrites are those who now pretend, that mere "moral restraint is, under a prohibition to marry, of sufficient force to preserve the innocence of farmers' men and maids!

No adopt this impious doctrine, pass a law to put it in force, and all the bands of society are broken. Stigmatize marriage, and promiscuous intercourse is warranted and encouraged by law. To stay the current of the natural and amiable passions is to war against nature and against God. If the terms of the gratification be changed from the obligations of marriage to the voluntary offerings of affection or caprice, the indulgence can only be the more frequent and followed by effects more calamitous. From a community of fathers, mothers and families of children, this kingdom, so long and so justly famed for kind husbands, virtuous wives, affectionate parents and dutiful children, will become one great brothel of unfeeling paramours, shameless prostitutes, and miserable homeless bastards. Such

is the point at which the greedy and crafty speakers of "lies in hypocrisy" are aiming; but, to that point they will never attain as long as there shall remain amongst us any portion of that justice and humanity, which have always heretofore been inseparable from the name of England.

"

ON THE

DUTIES OF PARSONS,

AND ON THE

INSTITUTION AND OBJECT OF TITHES.

"Woe to the idle Shepherd that leaveth the flock!"} ZECHARIAH, Ch. XI. V. 17,

"Woe be to the Shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! "Should not the Shepherds feed the flocks? Ye eat the fat, "and ye clothe you with the wool, ye kill them that are fed "but ye feed not the flock. The diseased have ye not strength"ened, neither have ye healed that which was sick, neither "have ye bound up that which was broken, neither have ye "brought again that which was driven away, neither have ye sought that which was lost; but with force and with cruelty "have ye ruled them. And they were scattered, because "there is no shepherd." EZEKIEL, Ch. 34. V. 2-5.

[ocr errors]

BLASPHEMY is the outcry of the day. To blas pheme is to revile God. But, according to the modern interpretation of the word, blasphemy means the expressing of a disbelief in the doctrines of the Christian

Religion. Now, does it not become us to consider a little how it can be that this disbelief, sometimes called infidelity, can possibly exist in this country? It may be observed, here, by the way, that Jews are notorious infidels; that they profess to ridicule the Christian Religion and boastingly call its founder an impostor. Yet, we see that the Jews are not denominated blasphemers. The Jews are not prosecuted. The Jews are, as we well know, a most cherished sect; and are possessed of influence that can hardly be described.

It is not my object, however, to defend, or to apologize for, the entertaining, and much less the promulgating, of principles of infidelity; but, to inquire how it can have happened, that such a continual interference of the secular arm should have been necessary to check the progress of this unbelief. We believe the Christian faith to be true; we believe it to have been the work of God himself; we believe, that by inspiration from Him came the Book of that faith. Now, truth, even without any such support; clear truth is a thing so strong in itself, that we always firmly rely on its prevailing in the end. How comes it, then, that a truth so important as this, and supported by such authority, should stand in need of the puny assistance of fine and imprisonment? This would naturally surprise us, even if the Christian Religion were left unprovided with a priesthood established by human laws; what, then must our surprise be, when we reflect, that we have a priesthood, appointed for the sole purpose of upholding this

« PredošláPokračovať »