Origins and Scope of Roe V. Wade: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, April 22, 1996
DIANE Publishing, 1996 - 125 strán (strany)
Čo hovoria ostatní - Napísať recenziu
Na obvyklých miestach sme nenašli žiadne recenzie.
Iné vydania - Zobraziť všetky
Abortion Ban Act adopted allow Amendment American argument baby become believe birth Blackmun CANADY Casey child choice choose claim clause concerns Congress consider constitutional continue decision doctor Douglas due process early embryo ethics example fact fetal fetus fundamental rights give going GREEN hold human HYDE identify important interests involved issue judgment Justice killing legislative limited lives look majority matter mean months moral mother Ninth nurse opinion Partial-Birth Abortion Ban patient performed person political position practice pregnancy President principles procedure Professor protection provision question reason regulate requires respect restrictions result risk rule society specific statement statute Subcommittee Supreme Court term testimony Thank thing Tiny tion tradition trimester TUSHNET unborn child understand unenumerated veto views Wade woman women
Strana 10 - Jesus loves the little children. All the children of the world Red and yellow, black and white, They are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world.
Strana 75 - ... a law that destroys, or impairs, the lawful private contracts of citizens; a law that makes a man a judge in his own cause; or a law that takes property from A and gives it to B: It is against all reason and justice, for a people to entrust a legislature with such powers; and, therefore, it cannot be presumed that they have done it.
Strana 86 - Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? The very idea is repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship.
Strana 87 - This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.
Strana 48 - We therefore conclude that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that this right is not unqualified and must be considered against important state interests in regulation.
Strana 34 - an abortion is necessary" is a professional judgment that the Georgia physician will be called upon to make routinely. We agree with the District Court, 319 F. Supp., at 1058, that the medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors— physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age— relevant to the well-being of the patient.
Strana 86 - Third is the freedom to care for one's health and person, freedom from bodily restraint or compulsion, freedom to walk, stroll, or loaf. These rights, though fundamental, are likewise subject to regulation on a showing of "compelling state interest.
Strana 98 - I remarked to the Conference that there were, literally, not enough columns to mark up an accurate reflection of the voting in either the Georgia or the Texas cases. I therefore marked down no votes and said this was a case that would have to stand or fall on the writing, when it was done.
Strana 47 - Art. 1195. Destroying unborn child "Whoever shall during parturition of the mother destroy the vitality or life in a child in a state of being born and before actual birth, which child would otherwise have been born alive, shall be confined in the penitentiary for life or for not less than five years.
Strana 50 - But to anyone looking at the problem more holistically as a question of how society can balance a woman's liberty with society's interest in protecting viable babies, this result seems nothing less than barbaric. The Supreme Court modified Roe somewhat in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey.