play, holdyng that play of Kyng Rychard to be so old, and so long out of yous [use], that they should have small or no cumpany at yt. But at theire request, this exam and his fellowes were content to play yt the Saterday, and have theise xls more then theire ordynary for yt, and so played yt accordyngly. Ex per Jo. Popham. Edw. Fenner.' Augustine Phillipps.' This remarkable document (the body of which is in Popham's handwriting)," &c. Introd, to King Richard the Second. Malone writes as follows; "It may seem strange that this old play should have been represented after Shakespeare's drama on the same subject had been printed: the reason undoubtedly was, that in the old play the deposing King Richard II. made a part of the exhibition: but in the first edition of our author's play, one hundred and fifty-four lines, describing a kind of trial of the king, and his actual deposition in parliament, were omitted; nor was it probably represented on the stage. Merrick, Cuffe, and the rest of Essex's train, naturally preferred the play in which his deposition was represented, their plot not aiming at the life of the queen. It is, I know, commonly thought that the parliament-scene (as it is called), which was first printed in the quarto of 1608, was an addition made by Shakespeare to his play after its first representation: but it seems to me more probable that it was written with the rest, and suppressed in the printed copy of 1597, from the fear of offending Elizabeth; against whom the Pope had published a bull in the preceding year, exhorting her subjects to take up arms against her. In 1599 Hayward published his History of the First Year of Henry IV., which in fact is nothing more than an history of the deposing Richard II. The displeasure which that book excited at court sufficiently accounts for the omitted lines not being inserted in the copy of this play which was published in 1602. Hayward was heavily censured in the Star-chamber, and committed to prison. At a subsequent period (1608), when King James was quietly and firmly settled on the throne, and the fear of internal commotion or foreign invasion no longer subsisted, neither the author, the managers of the theatre, nor the bookseller, could entertain any apprehension of giving offence to the sovereign: the rejected scene was restored without scruple, and from some playhouse copy probably found its way to the press." Life of Shakespeare, p. 325.-Dr. Simon Forman, in his Ms. Diary (Mus. Ashmol. Oxon.), gives an account of a "Richard 2" which he saw at the Globe, 1611, the 30 of Aprill, Thursday;" and, very probably, it was the old play which in 1601 had been acted before the friends of Essex-assuredly it was not our author's tragedy. For the incidents of King Richard the Second Shakespeare consulted Holinshed. DRAMATIS PERSONÆ, KING RICHARD the Second, JOHN OF GAUNT, duke of Lancaster, } uncles to the King. HENRY, surnamed Bolingbroke, duke of Hereford, son to John of Gaunt; afterwards King Henry IV. DUKE OF AUMERLE, son to the Duke of York, THOMAS MOWBRAY, duke of Norfolk, Lords, Heralds, Officers, Soldiers, two Gardeners, Keeper, Messenger, Groom, and other Attendants. SCENE-dispersedly in England and Wales. KING RICHARD II. ACT I. SCENE I. London. A room in the palace. Enter King RICHARD, attended; GAUNT, and other Nobles. K. Rich. Old John of Gaunt, time-honour'd Lancaster, Hast thou, according to thy oath and band, Brought hither Henry Hereford thy bold son, K. Rich. Tell me, moreover, hast thou sounded him, Or worthily, as a good subject should, On some known ground of treachery in him? Gaunt. As near as I could sift him on that argument, On some apparent danger seen in him Aim'd at your highness,-no inveterate malice. K. Rich. Then call them to our presence: face to face, And frowning brow to brow, ourselves will hear Th' accuser and th' accusèd freely speak: [Exeunt some Attendants. High-stomach'd are they both, and full of ire, rage deaf as the sea, hasty as fire. In Re-enter Attendants, with BOLINgbroke and Norfolk. Until the heavens, envying earth's good hap, K. Rich. We thank you both: yet one but flatters us, Against the duke of Norfolk, Thomas Mowbray? Boling. First, heaven be the record to my speech!— In the devotion of a subject's love, Tendering the precious safety of my prince, And wish, so please my sovereign,—ere I move, What my tongue speaks, my right-drawn sword may prove. Nor. Let not my cold words here accuse my zeal: 'Tis not the trial of a woman's war, The bitter clamour of two eager tongues, Can arbitrate this cause betwixt us twain; The blood is hot that must be cool'd for this: First, the fair reverence of your highness curbs me Which else would post until it had return'd And let him be no kinsman to my liege, I do defy him, and I spit at him; Call him a slanderous coward and a villain : And meet him, were I tied to run a-foot Boling, Pale trembling coward, there I throw my gage, Nor. I take it up; and by that sword I swear, Which gently laid my knighthood on my shoulder, I'll answer thee in any fair degree, Or chivalrous design of knightly trial: And when I mount, alive may I not light, If I be traitor or unjustly fight! K. Rich. What doth our cousin lay to Mowbray's charge? It must be great that can inherit us So much as of a thought of ill in him. Boling. Look, what I speak, my life shall prove it true;-That Mowbray hath receiv'd eight thousand nobles In name of lendings for your highness' soldiers, Complotted and contrived in this land Fetch from false Mowbray their first head and spring. Upon his bad life to make all this good,— That he did plot the Duke of Gloster's death, Suggest his soon-believing adversaries, And consequently, like a traitor-coward, |