ABS

Abstract idea of substance in Locke, s. 35;
at once precedes and follows the com-
plex, s. 36; his account of abstract
general ideas, s. 42, 80; rejected by
Berkeley, s. 175, 182; and by Hume,
s. 217, f.; p. 325, f.

Adequate and inadequate ideas in Locke,
s. 23, 89

Analysis and synthesis, s. 221
Analytical judgment; is it the only
function of thought? s. 118, f.
Animal spirits, p. 364
Antient philosophy, p. 505, f.
Apparent and real in Locke, s. 22, f.; in
Hume, s. 203

Archetype and ectype in Locke, s. 23,
116; p. 512, f.

Association of ideas in Hume, s. 196;
p. 319, f.

Bacon and Locke, s. 79, 123.

Belief as to matters of fact, s. 291, f. 326;
p. 394, f. 555; what produces belief,
p. 399, f.; why belief arises from
causation only, p. 407, f.; influence
of belief on the will, p. 417; on the
passions, p. 418; on the imagination,
p. 419

Berkeley's criticism of Locke, s. 100, 126,
154, f.; his idealism, s. 158, f.; his
fundamental error, s. 173; his doctrine
of God and the soul, s. 189, f.; fatal to

CAU

a true spiritualism, s. 192; and a true
theism, s. 193; the turn it ought to
have taken, s. 194

Body, equivocations in Locke's theory of,

s. 92, f.; exposed by Hume, s. 228, f.;
p. 512, f.; body and space vanish on
Berkeley's reduction of idea to feel-
ing, s. 174; this accepted by Hume,
s. 197, 229; p. 478, f. 512, f.

Cause involved in Locke's simple idea,
s. 20; correlative to substance, s. 53;
sensation gives no knowledge, except
as referred to cause, s. 62, Locke's
theory of cause, s. 68, f.; his inference
to an eternal cause, s. 147, f.; mean-
ing of cause, s. 149; Hume's theory
of cause, s. 210, 281, f., p. 375, f.;
knowledge of cause excluded by Locke's
definition of knowledge, s. 283; how
Hume reduces causation to an impres-
sion of reflection, s. 285, f.; p. 379, f.;
why a cause is always necessary, p.
380, f.; the component parts of our
reasonings concerning cause, s. 287
p. 384; the original impression, s. 290
p. 385; the inference to the idea,
s. 290, p. 388; the nature of the idea
or belief, s. 291, p. 394; how the be-
lief is produced, s. 292, p. 399; pro-
bability of causes, s. 335, p. 428;
necessary connexion of cause and

CER

effect, s. 292, p. 450; efficacy of causes,
p. 451; two definitions of cause, p. 463;
examination of these, s. 296, f.,
317, f., cause and identity, each as-
sumed by Hume to explain the other,
s. 311, f.; their true correlativity,
s. 313; rules for judging of causes
and effects, p. 466; the cause of our
perceptions, p. 529

Certainty and probability in Locke and
Hume, s. 226. p. 372, f.; certainty of
mathematics, s. 273, p. 373
Coexistence, s. 116, 258, p. 338
Common sense and Locke, s. 98
Comparison and relation, s. 297, f.; p.
322, 375

Conception the only act of the under-

standing, p. 396, note; conception and
notion, s. 183, note

Consciousness and the self, s. 127, f.,
144, f., 192, 200, 212, 240, 339;
p. 516, f., 533, f.

Custom and belief, p. 403, 414, 444

Distance and space, s. 110, 159, 244, 279;
p. 340, 360

Distinction of reason, s. 218; p. 332, 349,
370

Divisibility of space and time, s. 264, f.;
p. 334, f.

Empirical psychology, s. 7, 10, 16, 196,

200
'Esse'

'percipi,' s. 160, 183, 187, 195,
235, f.; p. 311, f. 370, 479, f. 523
Essence, Locke's doctrine of, s. 77, f.
Evidence of history, p. 384, 441
Existence, Locke's theory of, s. 28, f. 50, f.;
Hume's, s. 302, f.; p. 369, 478, f.;
existence of self, s. 143, f. 339, p. 533
Experience and popular logic, s. 119;
f. 320; Hume's account of, s. 312, f.,
p. 388

Fxtension, s. 110, 159, 233, f., p. 336 f.,
513, f.

Fact: matters of fact and relations of
ideas, s. 83, 104, 119, f. 153, 225 f.,
281 f., 291 f.; p. 372, 375, 394, 475,
518, 529, 540, 555

Fantastic and real ideas, s. 23, 203
Feeling and thought, s. 22, 100, 158, 173,

221, 228 f., 241, 253, 267, 304, 312,
320, 329, 342, &c.; Hume's text
passim

Finite and infinite, s. 138, f.
Fiction of identity, s. 210, 281, 301, f.,
342, f., p. 480, f. 506, f. 518, 533, f.

IND

General ideas and propositions in Locke.
8. 42, 80, 117; in Berkeley, s. 181, f,
216; in Hume, s. 217, f.; p. 325, f.
Generalization from experience, s. 119
Geometry in Berkeley, s. 178, f.; in
Hume, s. 273; p. 348, f.

God and the soul, Locke's doctrine of,
s. 126, f.; Berkeley's, s. 189, f.; Hume's,
s. 339; p. 517, f.; God as the subject of
the world, s. 146, f. 190

History, evidence of, p. 384, 441; history
of philosophy, how to be studied,
s. 1; distinguished from literary his-
tory, s. 4

Hume, the last English philosopher, s. 2;
Kant his true successor, s. 3; his filia.
tion to Locke, s. 3, 153, 281, &c.;
value of his system, s. 5; transition to
Hume from Locke through Berkeley,
s. 153, f. 194; how to be treated,
s. 154; his plausibility due to his
assuming the fiction' which he after-
wards destroys, s. 154, 201, 210, 231,
237, 259, 287, 303, 305, 317, 343, 345;
modern adaptations of him, s. 239, 334;
modern science and his doctrine of
cause, s. 324; refutes himself, s. 345
Hypothetical nature of mathematics: dis-
tinction between this doctrine and
Hume's, s. 275

Ideas, Locke's account of their origin,
&c., s. 11, f.; his confusion of ideas
in us and qualities in things, s. 18, 21,
89; idea and reality in Locke, s. 54,
f. 100; in Berkeley, s. 170, f.; Hume's
account of the origin of ideas, s. 195, f.,
p. 311; of their composition, con-
nexion, abstraction, &c., p. 312, f.
Ideal and real, s. 188

Identity, Locke's theory of, s. 71, f. 98,

134; Hume's, s. 210, 281, 301. f.,
342, f.; p. 376, 480, f., 489, 506, f.,
518, 533, f., 558
Imagination and memory, s. 195, 325,
332; p. 317, 386, 545
Immaterialityof the soul, Locke, Berkeley,
Hume, and Spinoza, s. 340; p. 516, f.
Import of propositions, s. 224
Impression and idea, s. 61, 195, 201, 244;
p. 311, f.. 327, 375. 396, and passim;
impressions of sensation and reflexion,
p. 316; of the senses and memory,
s. 327; p. 385, 407
Individual, as determined by relations,
substituted by Locke for the mere
particular, s. 47, f.; by Hume, s. 221,
304; p. 491, 493, &c.

IND

Inductive logic and Locke, s. 83, 123,
and Hume, s. 320, 333, 336, 338
Inner and outer sense, s. 129, f.
Interrogation of nature, s. 203, 323

Judgment and custom, p. 443, f.; rules

for judgment, p. 445, 446

Kant and Hume, s. 3, 315; and Locke,
8. 117, 118
Knowledge, Locke's definition of, s. 25;
the very rudiments of knowledge in-
volve the workmanship of the mind,'
8. 56, 66; knowledge of reality, s. 59, f.;
reality and certainty of knowledge,
s. 116; knowledge of self and God,
s. 143, f.; Berkeley's theory of know-
ledge, s. 181, f.; Hume's limitation of
knowledge, s. 223, 225, f., 263, 293,
335; p. 372, f., 380, 388, 403, 423,
436, 450, 461, 475, 545

Language, what it implies, s. 213
Law of causation and Hume, s. 336
Leibnitz and Hume, s. 2

Literary history distinguished from
history of philosophy, s. 4
Lively ideas real to Locke, s. 56, 188;
to Hume lively idea impression

=

simply, s. 195; p. 311, 327, &c.; to
Berkeley lively and coherent ideas are
real, s. 189; to Hume the fiction of
reality arises not from the liveliness
but the constancy, p. 484, 485
Locke, Hume's filiation to him, s. 3, 153,
281; his problem and method, s. 6,
f.; his theory of the origin of ideas,
s. 11, f.; his theory of knowledge, s.
25, f.; of essence, s. 77, f.; of self and
God, s. 126, f.; his merit, s. 130, 155;
his fundamental error, s. 16, 135;
Locke and Kant, s. 116, 118; and
Scholasticism, s. 118; and popular
logic, s. 119, f.; and natural science,
s. 121; Berkeley's criticism of him,
s. 154. f.; Hume's criticism of his
doctrine of abstract ideas, p. 325;
of ideality of mathematics, p. 348;
of cause, p. 382; of reality of lively
ideas, p. 484; of identity, p. 489; of
primary qualities, p. 511; of self,
P. 533

Man, science of, the foundation of all
sciences, p. 306, f.; rests on experi-
ence, p. 308

PHY

Materialism of Locke, its confusions, s.
156, f.; Berkeley's method of attack
on it and the true method, s. 158,

192

Materialists and theologians, p. 523
Mathematics and Locke, s. 112, 116, f.;
and Berkeley, s. 181, f.; and Hume,
s. 226, f., 263, f., 273; p. 338, 348,
350, 356, 373; the stumbling-block
of popular logic, s. 117, f.
Matter and thought, s. 132, 152; p. 529
Memory and imagination, s. 195, 324, f.,
332; p. 317, 386, 545

Metaphor of impression, s. 14, 100, 103
Metaphysics and physiology, s. 198, 199;
and psychology, s. 200

Mind, Locke's notion of, s. 7, f.; Hume's,
s. 346; p. 534, 541; mind not a sub-
stance, s. 129, 133

Minimum visibile, s. 264; p. 335
Miracles, Hume's argument against, s.
324, note

Names, meaning of, s. 80, 182, f. 213,
f.; p. 328, f.

Natural and philosophical relations, s.
206, 225, note; p. 322, 372, 163
Necessary connexion, s. 285, f. 292; p.
379, f. 388, f. 450, f. 460, f. 529,546,
559
Nominalism and Locke, s. 118; and
Hume, s. 217

Notion and conception, s. 183, note
Number, Hume's account of, s. 256, f.
277; p. 337, 373

PHY

Physiology and Hume, s. 198, f.
Popular logic and Locke, s. 119, f.; and
Hume, s. 202, 320.

Positivist, how he juggles with 'pheno-
mena,' s. 202; how he differs from
Hume, s. 203

Predication, Hume's theory of, s. 217, f.
Primary qualities in Locke, s. 19, 77,

97, f.; in Berkeley, s. 159, f.; in Hume,
s. 228, f.; p. 511
Probability and certainty, s. 226, 335;
p. 372, 375, 472; probability of
chances, p. 423; of causes, p. 428;
unphilosophical probability, p. 439
Propensity to feign, s. 196, 203, 231,
292, 305

Propositions, import of, s. 224, f.
Psychology, s. 7, 10, 135, 142, 152, 200

Qualities as coexistent, and succession

of feelings, s. 238, f.; p. 511, f. 523.
Quantity as such ignored by Hume,
s. 255; how he seems to save the
sciences of quantity, s. 263; p. 334,
336, f. 340, f. 372

Real and apparent in Locke, s. 22, f.;
in Hume, s. 203; in Hume and in-
ductive logic, s. 320; summary of
Locke's difficulties as to the real, s.
113; to Locke lively ideas are real,
s. 56, 118; to Berkeley lively and co-
herent ideas, s. 189; to Hume every
perception is real, p. 480; but we
ascribe a fictitious reality' to those
that are constant and coherent, p.
484, 485; the real can't be separated
from fictions of thought, s. 91, 329,
345, 346, and passim.

Reason of animals and of man, p. 469
Reasoning and perception, s. 283, f.
314; p. 376, 396, note; reasoning
from past to future, p. 388, 435;
from analogy, p. 439
Recognition, s. 312

Reflexion in Locke, s. 13, 127; in Berke-

ley, s. 170; in Hume. s. 197; p. 317
Relations in Locke, s. 33, f.; in Berke-
ley, s. 176, f. 183; in Hume, s 206,
f. 225, f. 276; natural and philoso-
phical relations, s 296, f. 317, f.; p.
322, f. 372, 463

Resemblance, s. 211, f. 303; p. 319, 364,
407, f.

Scepticism with regard to reason, p.
472; to the senses, p. 478; remedy
for scepticism, p. 505, 544

TIM

Scholasticism and Locke, s. 118
Science, how possible to Locke, s. 82, f.;
to Berkeley, s. 186; to Hume, s. 223,
f. 263, 294, 319. f. 324; science of
man, the basis of all sciences, p. 306;
rests on experience, p. 308.
Self, Locke's doctrine of, s. 126, f.;
Berkeley's, s. 189, f.; Hume's, s. 339,
f.; p. 517, f. 533, f. 558
Sensation and reflexion, s. 11, f.; s. 195,
f.; p. 317

Sensational theory, its assumptions, s.
22; its contradictions, s. 45, 85, &c.
Sight and touch, s. 159, 177, 233
Solidity and body, s. 101, 228, f.; p. 513
Soul, see self; immateriality of the soul,
s. 340; p. 516, f.

Space, Locke's account of, s. 110; Berke-
ley's, s. 174, f.; Hume's, s. 233, f.
252, f.; p. 334, f.; infinite divisibility
of space, how got rid of by Hume, s.
264; p. 336, f.; true way of dealing
with it, s. 271; no idea of empty
space, s. 179, 278; p. 358; summary
of contradictions in Hume's account
of space, s. 254

Spinoza and the theologians, s. 340;
p. 524

Spirit, not a substance but the source
of substance, s. 192
Substance, Locke's account of, s. 33, f.
50, 116. Hume's, s. 208, 214; p.
324, 505; thinking substance, s. 191,
339; p. 516

Synthesis and analysis, s. 221; synthesis
of successive feelings, s. 309
System of senses and memory and
system of judgment, s. 324, f. 327;
p. 408; this amounts to an abandon-
ment of Hume's fundamental prin-
ciple, s. 328; true unity of the two
systems, s. 330

Tabula rasa, can it know itself? s. 9;
what is it? s. 14, 15

Tangible and visible extension, s. 159,

177, 233; p. 345, 358

Theism and Pantheism, s. 151, 193.
Theology of Berkeley, s. 193; theolo-
gians and Spinoza, p. 524
Thought, can it originate? s. 43, 62,
118, f.; thought and things, s. 133;
thought and sense, s. 173, 281
Time, Hume's account of, s. 251, 259,
f.; p. 338, 342, 343, 346; no idea of
empty time, p. 358; time and num-
ber, s. 256; p. 489; events in time
and self, s. 142; and eternal cause, s
148, f.

TRU

Truth, real and verbal in Locke, s. 115

Understanding and imagination, p. 545 Uniformity of nature, not knowable on Locke's theory, s. 84, f,; nor on Hume's, s. 19, f; p. 372, f. 388, f. 403, f. 431, 459, f. 464, 475, &c.; to him it is a mere 'propensity' in us, s. 322; this won't do for science, s. 323; how Hume makes it seem to do, s. 324, f.

Units alone really exist to Hume, s. 258; p. 337; what are these units? 8.277

VUL

Universal propositions in Locke, s. 121; Berkeley's theory of universals, s. 182; its value, s. 183; universal propositions of geometry either untrue or unmeaning to Hume, s. 274

Vacuum, an impossible idea, s. 179, 278, f.; p. 358

Visible extension, see tangible
Vision, Berkeley's theory of, s. 159
Vulgar hypothesis of a distinct exist-
ence of perceptions, p. 491; how
Hume juggles with this, s. 304, f.

PRINTED BY

LONDON