Why the action which has reason to take it for an affront. If you are a 66 for there is nothing in me of what they say." As for my part, whoever should commend me for being a good pilot, or very modest, or very chaste, should owe him no thanks. And in like manner, whoever should call me traitor, robber, or drunkard, I should be as little offended. They, who do not know themselves, may feed their vanity with false applause; but not I, who see myself, and look into the very bottom of my heart, and very well know what belongs to me. I am content to be less commended, provided I am better known. I might be reckoned a wise man in such a sort of wisdom as I take to be folly. I am chagrined that my Essays serve the ladies only as a common moveable, or furniture for the ball. This chapter will advance me to the closet. I love a little private conversation with them; for that which is public, is without favour and without savour. In farewells we are warmed with a more than ordinary affection for the things we take leave of. I take my final leave of this world's joys. These are our last embraces. But, to come to my subject, what is the reason that the act of generation, an action so natural, so brings us necessary, and so justly the men's prerogative, what has it done that people dare not speak of it without a blush, and that it should be excluded from all into the world, is excluded gular dis serious and regular discourse? We boldly pronounce from seri- Ceux qui par trop fuyant Venus estrivent` Tu dea, tu rerum naturam sola gubernas, Verses, Amyot's translation of Plutarch, chap. 5. +Lucret. lib. i. ver. 22. are in a great con nection with Ve pus. Pallas and I cannot imagine who could set Pallas and the the Muses Muses at variance with Venus, and make them cold towards love; for I know no deities that tally better, or are more indebted to one another. He who will not own that the Muses have amorous imaginations, will rob them of the best entertainment they have, and of the noblest subject of their composition; and whoever shall deprive love of the communication and service of poetry, will disarm it of its best weapons. By these means they charge Pallas, the god of familiarity and benevolence, and the Muses, who are the tutelar deities of humanity and justice, with the vice of ingratitude and disrespect. I have not been so long cashiered from the suit and service of that deity, but my memory still retains its strength and power: Agnosco veteris vestigia flammæ.* Of my old flame there yet remain some sparks. Qual l'alto Egeo, perche aquilone o noto As when a storm, which late with furious blast, But, as far as I understand of the matter, the abili essence: Et versus digitos habet. ‡ And there's harmony in verse to charm a Venus. * Virg. Æneid. lib. iv. ver. 23. + Tasso's Gierusalem Liber. canto 12, stanza 65. Poetry represents a kind of air more amorous than love itself. Venus is not so beautiful, stark-naked, alive, and panting, as she is here in Virgil: Dixerat, et niveis hinc atque hinc diva lacertis Optatos dedit amplexus, placidumque petivit A streak of fire runs streaming through the clouds. This having said, love ba from mar All the fault I find in these lines is, that he has The tranrepresented her a little too much in rapture for a ports of married Venus. In this discreet partnership the nished appetites are not usually so wanton, but more grave riage, and and dull. Love hates that its votaries should be why. swayed by any motive foreign to itself, and is but cool in such familiarities as are formed and maintained under any other title, as marriage is, wherein it is reasonable to think that kindred and the dowry should have as much, or more weight, than comeliness and beauty. Men, say what they will, do not marry for themselves; they marry as much, or more, for the sake of posterity and their families. The interest and usefulness of marriage concerns our descendants far beyond our time; and therefore I like the way of negotiating it by a third hand, and by the judgment of others, rather than by that of * Eneid lib. viii. ver, 387, 392, 404, 405, 406. That love to be found than virtue the parties that are to be married: and how opposite Quô* rapiat sitiens Venerem interiusque recondat.† I see no marriages that sooner miscarry, or are disturbed, than those which are spurred on by beauty and amorous desires. The foundations should be more solid and constant, and they should be proceeded in with circumspection. This furious ardour in them is good for nothing. They who think to do honour to the married state, is no more by joining love to it, are methinks like those who, in in the mar- favour of virtue, hold that nobility is nothing else ried state but virtue. They are indeed somewhat akin, but in nobility. they differ very much; and therefore to confound their names and titles is doing wrong to both. Nobility is a fine quality, and with reason introduced; but, forasmuch as it is a quality dependent on another, and which may fall to a man who is vicious and good for nothing, it is far below virtue in estimation. If it be virtue, it is a virtue that is artificial and apparent, depending on time and chance, differing in form according to the various countries, living * Montaigne has explained this verse enough before he quoted it. + Virg. Geo, lib. iii. ver. 137. |