Sustainable Energy Consumption and Society: Personal, Technological, Or Social Change?

Predný obal
Springer Science & Business Media, 14. 2. 2005 - 204 strán (strany)
Origin of this book In 1998 the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) initiated the 2000 Watt Society, a University-wide research program meant to help Switzerland realize a dramatic reduction in its future energy use. A project within the initiative “Sustainability in the ETH domain,” the 2000 Watt per capita Society sought to promote “the gradual introduction of a way of living and working that requires only one-third of current energy consumption but 1 2 still delivers an improved quality of life. ” Two thousand watts is roughly the current world average per capita energy consumption; it was the average level in Switzerland in the 1950s; it is some three times less than current 3 Swiss usage; and reducing to that level again (in concert with other industrialized nations) would greatly facilitate stabilization of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO )levels in the long-term, given projections about world 2 population growth and exploitable energy resources [Imboden 1999]. 1 http://www. novatlantis. ch/frames_e. html. 2 A watt is a power term equivalent to 1 joule/second. Non-engineers generally prefer to think of 2000 watts per capita in terms of energy use per unit time such as joules/second or kilowatt-hours/hour. For Switzerland, 2000 watts per capita is equivalent to a primary annual energy consumption of about 65 gigajoules (65 billion joules) per capita. Although less generally communicative, the 2000 watt name is clean and trim, and since it has stuck we will use it throughout the book.
 

Obsah

SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND THE PUBLICS ROOM TO MANEUVER IN ENERGY USE
1
2 The consumer society
4
3 Consumption trajectories in western europe
5
4 NorthSouth disparities northern consumerist models and global resource constraints
8
5 The evolving international discourse on sustainable consumption
11
Which is the better focus for addressing environmental problems?
12
7 Room to maneuver in energy use
16
71 Northern societys discretion in energy use
18
4 Interviewee recruitment
124
means
127
81 Subject groups
129
812 Group II data summary
130
813 Group III data summary
131
821 Note on correlation analysis
133
832 Correlations
134
Nondiscretionary accounting Perception of less discretionary influences and Communicating about Energy Consumption
135

8 Research questions and challenges in this book
20
TARGETS OF INTERVENTION FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION
25
consumption
27
22 Efficiency and dematerialization
30
23 Levels of consumption
32
3 An expanded multidisciplinary analysis of consumptions driving forces and possibilities for intervention
36
31 Consumption critiques
37
32 Psychological and behavioral treatments
39
322 Needs and wants identity and meaning
41
33 Social treatments
44
332 Anthropologicalsociological treatments of needs wants and restraint
49
34 Economic treatments
52
342 Decoupling consumption and welfare
53
343 Restraint and sufficiency
57
344 Breaking the workandspend cycle
59
Policy syntheses and political implications
65
42 Political implications and alternatives
68
ENERGY ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY KNOWLEDGE AND RISK COMMUNICATION
73
2 Alternative research approaches and a frame for discussing knowledge in the context of discretionary and nondiscretionary energy consumption
74
22 Selected topics in the EnergyRevealing approach and actors discretionary energy consumption
80
2212 Public attitudes and knowledge of climate change
82
222 Psychological factors and knowledge in energyrelevant ecological behavior
85
2222 Knowledge
88
23 The SocialRevealing approach and less discretionary influences on energy consumption
91
232 Public perception and perceived control of less discretionary factors
97
3 Energy and risk communication
99
32 Risk communication
102
322 Levels of trust in management of creeping danger risks
103
323 Routes of persuasion and levels of debate
104
324 More on the social amplification of risk
106
325 Proposed application of risk communication and ecological modernization with caveats
107
4 Final comments and further applications
111
FIELD STUDY WITH COMPUTERAIDED INTERVIEWS
113
2 Experimental hypotheses and user questions
114
3 Software development and modeling
119
8412 Group I
136
8413 Group II
137
8414 Group III
138
Importance of behaviorpersonal influences on subjects current energy use
139
8441 No change fully confirmed
140
8443 Partly confirmed partly changed
141
845 Technological vs social factors effects on national energy use
144
Comparison of strength of Type I vs Type II influences on Swiss national energy consumption
146
846 Ranking key players degree of responsibility for national energy conservation
147
8462 Conclusions
148
Separation of social from technological influences
149
851 Group I
150
852 Group II
151
861 Subjects followup assessment of the exercise
153
872 Shaping future Swiss consumption trajectories
155
873 Affecting lessdiscretionary forces and the role and influence of the consumercitizen
156
88 Energy Communication
157
Subjects assessments of the environmental friendliness of their lifestyle as measured against an ecological standard 2000 wattsperson
158
Subjects mistrust of the data and model
159
Misleading misplaced emphasis in the presentation of technological and social factors
161
89 Subjects evaluation of the program and the interview session
162
894 Usefulness of the program for informing and educating the general public
163
ACHIEVEMENTS OPEN QUESTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
165
11 Topdown or bottomup?
166
12 Metric for gauging experimental success
167
13 Success in researching and applying domestic sustainable consumption
168
14 Pedagogical use and timing
170
2 Lifestyle groups and differentiated approaches to sustainable consumption
172
4 Success in risk communication
174
5 Suggestions for further research
177
6 Some open questions
180
7 Divergence from the prevailing environmental framework
181
References
185
Index
197
Autorské práva

Iné vydania - Zobraziť všetky

Časté výrazy a frázy

O tomto autorovi (2005)

David L. Goldblatt was awarded the 2003 ETH Medal for Outstanding Doctoral Work. He is currently a science and Technology Policy Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Bibliografické informácie